Page 20 of 20
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 10:00 pm
by Tone Deft
djadonis206 wrote:Well, I can't pretend to know about military action and global stradgey - but I can say this. It's not Obama or Clinton I worry about when it comes to normative violence. I worry about China, North Korea, some (SOME) middle eastern countries.
As China becomes THE economic super power they will no doubt become the world Military super power.
If, if us or some other ally is not in a position (on a global scale) to protect the people of that country then well...something bad might happen.
I'm totally against the Iraq thing and so on and so on
Russia will also be on that list of concerns in the coming year.
it's kind of funny watching China get the piss taken out of them over the Olympics, I guess for once it's not the US who's the bad guy.
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 10:11 pm
by djadonis206
So yeah, not directed at anyone in particular but an observation
Why would the OP assume just because someone is democrat "home(land) security" wouldn't be an issue?
that's just ig'nant...
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 10:24 pm
by Tone Deft
djadonis206 wrote:So yeah, not directed at anyone in particular but an observation
Why would the OP assume just because someone is democrat "home(land) security" wouldn't be an issue?
that's just ig'nant...
it's the usual crap they use to divide people. <rant deleted>
idea - issues like gun control, gay marriage and abortion will never be resolved, if they were, they wouldn't have easy tools to divide the masses.
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 10:25 pm
by glu
djadonis206 wrote:So yeah, not directed at anyone in particular but an observation
Why would the OP assume just because someone is democrat "home(land) security" wouldn't be an issue?
that's just ig'nant...
yes it is but the republicans have a long history of using certain political discourses
as their own. McCain recently said on the Daily show that Hamas' support of Obama
is indicative of why he is wrong for the country... so I would say that republicans
are better at making political issues THEIR issues. It's a smart strategy, democrats
have done the same with health insurance, but it isn't nearly as damaging as making
homeland security something that only republicans can do. Very similar to the
the whole 'tough on crime' issue in the late 80s and early 90s.
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 5:33 am
by glu
glu wrote:djadonis206 wrote:
and protecting the homeland - that's a joke
WORD!
back from october 2006 hehe
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:48 pm
by Tone Deft
so, they're calling the Democratic nomination for Obama, Clinton is considering the VP position.
http://www.sootoday.com/content/news/fu ... mber=32495
AND Gina Gershon might have been riding Bill's hobby horse.
http://www.gaywired.com/article.cfm?id=19187§ion=67
great time to be a Clinton.
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:59 pm
by djadonis206
He needs 10 more delegates to officially clinch the nomination which, well he'll do even if he gets 20% in both states tonight
I think him and hildawg would be good running mates - but it would get really weird like say 2 or 3 years into his presidency...let your imagination run wild with that...
...and who ever said Bill STOPPED being a pimp...don't hate the player, hate the game
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:28 pm
by forge
this one form AP says it's done
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/P/ ... TE=DEFAULT
but jeez - lets stop bumping this god awful thread title!!!!!
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:51 pm
by Sleep Tyght
6 delegates to go. Lol!
Guess all that irrational bitchin' about handing over delegates from 50 states to Hillary...
and only delegates from 49 to Obama...
Was all for nothing. What sort of illogical bullshit argument was that anyways? Looks like attempting to ride the coattails of backwoods inbred racists and a bunch of irrational wannabe cheatin' ass feminists all the way to the white house didn't work after all. Oh well...
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 12:10 am
by Machinate
forge wrote:but jeez - lets stop bumping this god awful thread title!!!!!
