Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:11 pm
how can you say it's not?CHARLIE! wrote:How has noone mentioned that the feature set he posted is unreal if it is actually true.
how can you say it's not?CHARLIE! wrote:How has noone mentioned that the feature set he posted is unreal if it is actually true.
it is unreal, hopefully not literally. hard to imagine that folks like AKAI, Roland, etc have been around for many, many years and it took them that long to get where they are now, technology-wise. and Roger Linn/Dave Smith, two geniuses, have been working and reworking the LinnDrum for as long as they have - and then this handful of ex-sales reps/beat makers/whatever come out of nowhere and develop something so far ahead? hey, stranger things have happened but only time will tell. i'll believe it when i see it. they're at NAMM supposedly with a working model so we'll see.CHARLIE! wrote:How has noone mentioned that the feature set he posted is unreal if it is actually true.
tjwett wrote:it is unreal, hopefully not literally. hard to imagine that folks like AKAI, Roland, etc have been around for many, many years and it took them that long to get where they are now, technology-wise. and Roger Linn/Dave Smith, two geniuses, have been working and reworking the LinnDrum for as long as they have - and then this handful of ex-sales reps/beat makers/whatever come out of nowhere and develop something so far ahead? hey, stranger things have happened but only time will tell. i'll believe it when i see it. they're at NAMM supposedly with a working model so we'll see.CHARLIE! wrote:How has noone mentioned that the feature set he posted is unreal if it is actually true.
making hardware is EXPENSIVE. i just can't see these guyz walking into a venture capital meeting trying to pitch this thing with all the "thangz" and "kangz" and "bangin' ass soundz" and a dude in a suit going "you've struck oil! here's a blank check."
there's a single photo on the website of them and some old white guy holding one, looks real enough. other than that, they say there will be a working one at NAMM but that's it AFAIK.adventurepants_ wrote:have they actually made one? all the pics and videos are just 3d renders, is there any proof that this physically exists in working form?
anyone can make a mockup of anything. it seems odd they dont have any video of it working, if they had a working one to promote!tjwett wrote:there's a single photo on the website of them and some old white guy holding one, looks real enough. other than that, they say there will be a working one at NAMM but that's it AFAIK.adventurepants_ wrote:have they actually made one? all the pics and videos are just 3d renders, is there any proof that this physically exists in working form?
hey anything is possible. i bought Live v1 as soon as it came out when Ableton was a very tiny new kid on the block and there was about 20 of us on this forum. it took a while for them to become an industry standard, they'd probably tell you they are still far from that goal too in the grand scheme of things. who knows. the way they are marketing this thing seems way too narrow to survive. you can't generate mass appeal with tunnel vision. and you can't sustain a hardware company without mass appeal. well, on second thought, Elektron are a alive and kicking. but that's a more boutique market. eh fuck my point.CHARLIE! wrote:tjwett wrote:it is unreal, hopefully not literally. hard to imagine that folks like AKAI, Roland, etc have been around for many, many years and it took them that long to get where they are now, technology-wise. and Roger Linn/Dave Smith, two geniuses, have been working and reworking the LinnDrum for as long as they have - and then this handful of ex-sales reps/beat makers/whatever come out of nowhere and develop something so far ahead? hey, stranger things have happened but only time will tell. i'll believe it when i see it. they're at NAMM supposedly with a working model so we'll see.CHARLIE! wrote:How has noone mentioned that the feature set he posted is unreal if it is actually true.
making hardware is EXPENSIVE. i just can't see these guyz walking into a venture capital meeting trying to pitch this thing with all the "thangz" and "kangz" and "bangin' ass soundz" and a dude in a suit going "you've struck oil! here's a blank check."
Haha fair enough, but sometimes those big time companies are stuck in their ways. I think it often takes a small developer to put together sometimes obvious features that the big guys forget. Also a lot of times the big guys are just competing with the industry standards and are slower to push forward due to large infrastructure.
I mean this is based on not seeing the product in action and I have first hand experienced what it is like to buy a first gen product from a company new in the game. (I bought one of the first ASUS laptops a few years ago and it had some problems).
We shall see I suppose.
vaporware. funny thing is that there's a large chance their phat beats weren't made on that machine, otherwise, just show a video playing with that beat. the lightshow is bullshit, simple code running on the microcontroller turning LEDs on and off, that's about as simple as it gets and shows nothing about it actually working.
now ^that was funnyadventurepants_ wrote:its not the vaporware aspect thats funny, its the PR style.
what happens if i buy one and dont like it, and they cant find a way to not have to kill me?