i'm not saying that meds are not useful for some people in some situations, but there are some pretty serious questions surrounding their over-prescription and ethical issues concerning the extremely lucrative and powerful pharmaceutical industry and it's relationships with psychiatrists and physicians...jonny72 wrote:There seems to be some kind of taboo about taking medication for mental health issues, especially long term. For any other medical condition (migraines, blood pressure etc) its not a problem, the doctor prescribes the pills and you take them. But when its a mental health issue most people don't like the idea of taking medication for it. Not sure why this is the case, but I was the same for a long time.
philosophically, the biomedical model of mental disease and drug treatment (which is completely dominant in the US, and has been since the 80's) is based on the assumption that mental health issues are the result of faulty biochemical brain processes... mental illnesses were defined as discrete 'diseases' in the DSM-III (the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders of the American Psychiatric Association)using the medical disease model, but these definitions were not actually based on empirical evidence... the impact of a person's environment, upbringing, relationhips, culture, society, etc. are all downplayed in this model...
long-term use of meds is an issue because researchers do not know how these drugs actually work in the short-term, much less what their long-term effects are... most people would be shocked at the actual process of drug approval by the FDA...
this is good site to start with for some alternative info on psych drugs:
http://www.breggin.com/