cheers for the tip
Operator Love Thread
Re: Operator Love Thread
I've just trid both algo and wave chooser with 2 LFO max devices... Nasty fun
cheers for the tip
cheers for the tip
-
störgeräusche
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 9:04 pm
- Contact:
Re: Operator Love Thread
thanks for this thread guys
falling in love with operator again, after many years of almost hardware only and recently getting back ITB... operator is definitively a treasure in my synth arsenal.
I still dream of an hardware version of it, even if i know it'd probably make no sense, expecially from a commercial point of view, but still.
Think about, an operator you can touch and feel. same layout. big display in the middle and all the knobs.
falling in love with operator again, after many years of almost hardware only and recently getting back ITB... operator is definitively a treasure in my synth arsenal.
I still dream of an hardware version of it, even if i know it'd probably make no sense, expecially from a commercial point of view, but still.
Think about, an operator you can touch and feel. same layout. big display in the middle and all the knobs.
soundcloud
website
______________________________________________________
Win7 Pro 64 - i7 870 @ 2.93 GHz - 16 GB RAM - RME Multiface II
Live Suite 9 - Komplete 9 - Waldorf Largo & Edition - Elektron Analog Rytm - Push 1&2- Launch Control & XL -
Adam P33A
website
______________________________________________________
Win7 Pro 64 - i7 870 @ 2.93 GHz - 16 GB RAM - RME Multiface II
Live Suite 9 - Komplete 9 - Waldorf Largo & Edition - Elektron Analog Rytm - Push 1&2- Launch Control & XL -
Adam P33A
Re: Operator Love Thread
John Chowning on the origins of FM synthesis..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4g92vX1YF4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4g92vX1YF4
Re: Operator Love Thread
As long as the knobs were a decent sizestörgeräusche wrote:thanks for this thread guys
falling in love with operator again, after many years of almost hardware only and recently getting back ITB... operator is definitively a treasure in my synth arsenal.
I still dream of an hardware version of it, even if i know it'd probably make no sense, expecially from a commercial point of view, but still.
Think about, an operator you can touch and feel. same layout. big display in the middle and all the knobs.
-
pencilrocket
- Posts: 1718
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:46 am
Re: Operator Love Thread
The Spread function sucks. It only can add digitally created symmetrical stereo image to the oscilators. Far from the warm analog sounding.
Re: Operator Love Thread
^


LoopStationZebra wrote:it's like a hipster commie pinko manifesto. Rambling. Angry. Nearly divorced from all reality; yet strangely compelling with a ring of truth.
Re: Operator Love Thread
Feel the love...pencilrocket wrote:The Spread function sucks. It only can add digitally created symmetrical stereo image to the oscilators. Far from the warm analog sounding.
You have a point. Although what's warm analog sounding about a Yamaha DX7?
mendeldrive wrote:NOBODY designs their own sounds... There is ZERO point in reinventing the wheel.
-
stoersignal
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 9:43 pm
- Location: vienna
Re: Operator Love Thread
+1 for operator! love it too. some tracks of mine are strictly operator only.
one more great thing for maxforlive owners is the operator advanced envelope! don`t know why nobody knows it. its pretty good as it gives you the possibility for multistage envelopes, curves (wherever you want).
at the moment this device is just for one operator and a second destination, but i`m workin on a patch for all envelopes inside operator
one more great thing for maxforlive owners is the operator advanced envelope! don`t know why nobody knows it. its pretty good as it gives you the possibility for multistage envelopes, curves (wherever you want).
at the moment this device is just for one operator and a second destination, but i`m workin on a patch for all envelopes inside operator
-
Ableton_David
- Posts: 1766
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:31 pm
- Location: Ableton
- Contact:
Re: Operator Love Thread
Have you tried using Chorus, Dynamic Tube, Saturator and Reverb here? These can all contribute the "warmer" sound that you're looking for. Additionally, FM isn't your best bet for something that sounds like a hardware analog synth - you might try Analog for that.pencilrocket wrote:Far from the warm analog sounding.
-
Matt_Quinn
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 2:47 pm
Re: Operator Love Thread
One thing I really do wish it could do is set all it's envelopes in terms of beats instead of hz. Seems weird that you can do that for the envelope loop but not the envelope itself.
the_planet wrote:Trap music is not supported in the current version.
-
pencilrocket
- Posts: 1718
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:46 am
Re: Operator Love Thread
Thx. Yea I know chorus and distortion plugin work to create stereo image, and FM doesn't directly produce retro synth sound.Ableton_David wrote:Have you tried using Chorus, Dynamic Tube, Saturator and Reverb here? These can all contribute the "warmer" sound that you're looking for. Additionally, FM isn't your best bet for something that sounds like a hardware analog synth - you might try Analog for that.
For the analog sounding I mean not-symmetrical stereo image. The Spread function creates almost same stereo image whatever paremeter set. The meaning of digital can be of course used positively. But this time it's a bad example of 'digital'. I don't get why Operator have imitated this bad example even if it is trying to replicate an old synth. It results we feel thinner sound than the other synths that do random stereo spreading. I think there are people that already recognized what I'm talking. Even for FM synth, it needs right amount of stereo randomness to create heavier growl, not to mention warm sounding. That's what I thought about the Spread funtion.
-
Matt_Quinn
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 2:47 pm
Re: Operator Love Thread
pencilrocket wrote: It results we feel thinner sound than the other synths that do random stereo spreading. I think there are people that already recognized what I'm talking. Even for FM synth, it needs right amount of stereo randomness to create heavier growl, not to mention warm sounding. That's what I thought about the Spread funtion.
You can use Autopan for more controlled stereo randomness.
the_planet wrote:Trap music is not supported in the current version.
Re: Operator Love Thread
"Warm/Analog" isn't the goal of an FM synth, even though Operator is well capable of great VA sounds anyway.Far from the warm analog sounding.
Are you also mad that Analog can't do metallic, clangorous sounds?
Re: Operator Love Thread
Spread was never intended to sound 'warm'.
Spread uses two voices per note, one panned hard to the left and the other panned hard to the right.
It also detunes these two voices. But this is just the most obvious effect. The more exciting things happen when random is involved: The left and right channel will behave different then. Try a sample & hold LFO modulation, oscillators in free running mode etc. Suddenly everything gets very wide. That's the main intention of the function. Analog warmth was never a development goal for Operator. The spread function was inspired by the chorus of the Synclavier II ( later models with the stereo FM boards, where the voices could be panned )
Robert
Spread uses two voices per note, one panned hard to the left and the other panned hard to the right.
It also detunes these two voices. But this is just the most obvious effect. The more exciting things happen when random is involved: The left and right channel will behave different then. Try a sample & hold LFO modulation, oscillators in free running mode etc. Suddenly everything gets very wide. That's the main intention of the function. Analog warmth was never a development goal for Operator. The spread function was inspired by the chorus of the Synclavier II ( later models with the stereo FM boards, where the voices could be panned )
Robert
-
pencilrocket
- Posts: 1718
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:46 am
Re: Operator Love Thread
Thanks. So this makes 2 voices panned 100% left and right wherever the knob set. The main job of this knob is the changing the amount of detuning. I didn't know it's always 100% pannning. It clears some misgiving about the use of spread function.monolake wrote:Spread was never intended to sound 'warm'.
Spread uses two voices per note, one panned hard to the left and the other panned hard to the right.
It also detunes these two voices. But this is just the most obvious effect. The more exciting things happen when random is involved: The left and right channel will behave different then. Try a sample & hold LFO modulation, oscillators in free running mode etc. Suddenly everything gets very wide. That's the main intention of the function. Analog warmth was never a development goal for Operator. The spread function was inspired by the chorus of the Synclavier II ( later models with the stereo FM boards, where the voices could be panned )
Robert