Ableton Forum

simmerdown wrote:all this technical whatev did not get in the way of my enjoying the show, i must be a blind idiot

found out too that alot of the added material came from the appendices of the book and some other unpublished background material that were written by tolkien, so that's pretty much legit

one standout great part to me was the 'riddles in the dark' scene, golum has never been more 'real', and thats where bilbo won me over

+1. There was enough distance from LOTR both in time and hype for me to watch it with pretty much fresh eyes. I saw none of the above mentioned critical technical comments, except for the scene where the dwarfs and Gandalf were escaping from ...... It was just to long and a tad corny. Overall though, for me, there was enough story mixed with scene setting for not only the Hobbit, but back story for LOTR to make it a good watch.

simmerdown wrote:all this technical whatev did not get in the way of my enjoying the show, i must be a blind idiot

found out too that alot of the added material came from the appendices of the book and some other unpublished background material that were written by tolkien, so that's pretty much legit

one standout great part to me was the 'riddles in the dark' scene, golum has never been more 'real', and thats where bilbo won me over

Its not so much your blind but that you havent seen.

i did actually notice a few of the things, like gandalf sliding off the eagle and others, but also was blown away by the realism in some shots, so maybe a bit of uneven-ness could be a legit criticism, for me it was all easily forgiven

from the NPR review:

You'll sense that there's a bit of padding going on here. Although Tolkien's novel The Hobbit, or There and Back Again, is shorter than any one of the three books that make up Lord of the Rings, it's being turned all by itself into three new movies. So where the challenge in LOTR was to condense and reduce and condense again, the challenge here is to include every syllable, plus an appendix or two to boot.

i did sense this, but, y'know...its ok

and people need to remember that it's not an action movie, not a jj abrams avengers episode, the parts people got bored in were probably where characters were talking, revealing motivations, acting, stuff like that?

i look forward to when they ever start filming the silmarilliion, now there are some really epic mythical stories

simmerdown wrote: characters were talking, revealing motivations, acting, stuff like that?

what is this ta lk ing? you mean when she takes off her helmet and her hair falls by her breasts which happen to be glistening because of the fire hydrant that exploded when she drove by?

rev eal ing mot iva tions? is this where the bad guy has them with no escape and he starts bragging like he's like soooo coool and somebody like frees their hands and then BLAM BOOM BAM!!

and this ac ting? is this when he dives out of the way of the explosion? or is it when he says that cool thing right before he fires his bazooka?

there is no liv tyler in this flick, nothing even remotely close

what about J-Lo and Carmen Electra?

Jessica Simpson is in it right?

nope, you got a few minutes of an aging galadriel...and golum

Galadriel yum.

so this Lyndsey Lohan part that you mention above, does she play him in this movie same as the last one?

lindsay seems to have fallen apart, let herself go as they say, notable only for her squandered potential

wait, what?

The plot of the movie is weak. I read the book ten or so years ago, and couldn't remember most of it, so I came to the movie pretty green. Here are my comments:

- 3D cinema is gay. And by gay, I mean it fucks you in the arse, touches kids and gives you AIDS.
- The plot is totally directionless.
- Fuck.

Looking forward to part 2

JuanSOLO wrote:Daytime soap opera meets video game.

I hope the industry does not push forward with this 48fps bullshit.

FWIW, I've noticed the "soap opera" effect on my new LED TV with any content that was filmed in HD. So shows like the Walking Dead or Dexter look like "movies" on my older HD but they look like you're on a set on my new TV, which sounds exactly like what people are saying about The Hobbit, but on the big screen. What's the deal with that?

stringtapper wrote:

JuanSOLO wrote:Daytime soap opera meets video game.

I hope the industry does not push forward with this 48fps bullshit.

FWIW, I've noticed the "soap opera" effect on my new LED TV with any content that was filmed in HD. So shows like the Walking Dead or Dexter look like "movies" on my older HD but they look like you're on a set on my new TV, which sounds exactly like what people are saying about The Hobbit, but on the big screen. What's the deal with that?

I noticed this on HBO HD shows. Thought I was watching a Behind the Scenes for the first 20 minutes.

I have no doubt within a couple years TVs will come with filter plugins that will make the show look like it was filmed in a decade of your choosing.

The whole TELEPLAY look is fucking UNWATCHABLE to me.

Un
Watch
Able



It's like watching some shitty BBC production of Richard III from the 1970s.

omfg.

LoopStationZebra wrote:The whole TELEPLAY look is fucking UNWATCHABLE to me.

Un
Watch
Able



It's like watching some shitty BBC production of Richard III from the 1970s.

omfg.

Well yeah. The first thing I thought when I saw the phenomenon was the BBC Hitchiker's Guide series.

But why is it happening with shows I've already watched that didn't have that look on an older HDTV?