The Great BMW Debate

Discuss anything related to audio or music production.
beats me
Posts: 23319
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:39 pm

Re: The Great BMW Debate

Post by beats me » Wed Dec 04, 2013 9:49 pm

Goddamnit. I'm adding value in this thread. Fuck you guys! :x

stringtapper
Posts: 6321
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm

Re: The Great BMW Debate

Post by stringtapper » Wed Dec 04, 2013 9:54 pm

The argument that quality is not a determinant of price seems illogical. (<- Funken take notice how i didn't say it was "fucking stupid" or some other insult.)

How do you explain the rampant importing of cheap goods from China into the U.S.?

An MIA Fender Jazz is simply a better quality instrument than MIM or MIJ basses (although the Mexican Fender factories have upped quality significantly in recent years) and that difference is reflected in the price.

On the other hand I have no idea what the fuck this means:
Funk N. Furter wrote:more socially necessary labour
(See again, no insult, it's easy!)
Unsound Designer

Galt
Posts: 966
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:12 pm

Re: The Great BMW Debate

Post by Galt » Wed Dec 04, 2013 9:57 pm

Funk N. Furter wrote:SOCIALLY NECESSARY
Explain to me why Star Wars Episode III is more socially necessary than my burnt omelette.

Galt
Posts: 966
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:12 pm

Re: The Great BMW Debate

Post by Galt » Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:11 pm

Funk N. Furter wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost-of-pr ... y_of_value

Cost-of-production theory of value

"In economics, the cost-of-production theory of value is the theory that the price of an object or condition is determined by the sum of the cost of the resources that went into making it. The cost can comprise any of the factors of production (including labor, capital, or land) and taxation."
Yesterday, I spent $10'000 on 4K TVs, which I then welded together and shat on. For some reason, I couldn't find anyone to buy my master piece which, after 4 hours of work at $500 an hour, I was trying to sell at $12'000, although I could have charged more, were I to factor in the cost of the six burgers which went into producing my epic arsepat.

Your theory sucks.
Last edited by Galt on Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Galt
Posts: 966
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:12 pm

Re: The Great BMW Debate

Post by Galt » Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:13 pm

Back to the spamming are we? :roll:

stringtapper
Posts: 6321
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm

Re: The Great BMW Debate

Post by stringtapper » Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:15 pm

Both of you suck at actually debating points. (<- that's an insult… and an observation :mrgreen: )

You're ideologues hopelessly entrenched in your extreme views.

I'm pouring gasoline on this thread, locking both of you in it, and lighting a motherfucking match.

:x
Unsound Designer

Galt
Posts: 966
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:12 pm

Re: The Great BMW Debate

Post by Galt » Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:29 pm

But how much will all that hard work be worth?

stringtapper
Posts: 6321
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm

Re: The Great BMW Debate

Post by stringtapper » Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:35 pm

A lot.

Image
Unsound Designer

stringtapper
Posts: 6321
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm

Re: The Great BMW Debate

Post by stringtapper » Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:47 pm

Well then I'm buying one of these:

Image

Watch your ectoplasmic ass.

:x
Unsound Designer

TomViolenz
Posts: 6854
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:19 pm

Re: The Great BMW Debate

Post by TomViolenz » Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:05 pm

Galt wrote:
Funk N. Furter wrote:SOCIALLY NECESSARY
Explain to me why Star Wars Episode III is more socially necessary than my burnt omelette.
It isn't! But then I never was much into Star Wars. (No, I'm not a Trekie either ;-))

TomViolenz
Posts: 6854
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:19 pm

Re: The Great BMW Debate

Post by TomViolenz » Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:10 pm

Funk N. Furter wrote:
Some people might think that if the value of a commodity is determined by the quantity of labour spent on it, the more idle and unskilful the labourer, the more valuable would his commodity be, because more time would be required in its production. The labour, however, that forms the substance of value, is homogeneous human labour, expenditure of one uniform labour power. The total labour power of society, which is embodied in the sum total of the values of all commodities produced by that society, counts here as one homogeneous mass of human labour power, composed though it be of innumerable individual units. Each of these units is the same as any other, so far as it has the character of the average labour power of society, and takes effect as such; that is, so far as it requires for producing a commodity, no more time than is needed on an average, no more than is socially necessary. The labour time socially necessary is that required to produce an article under the normal conditions of production, and with the average degree of skill and intensity prevalent at the time. The introduction of power-looms into England probably reduced by one-half the labour required to weave a given quantity of yarn into cloth. The hand-loom weavers, as a matter of fact, continued to require the same time as before; but for all that, the product of one hour of their labour represented after the change only half an hour’s social labour, and consequently fell to one-half its former value.

We see then that that which determines the magnitude of the value of any article is the amount of labour socially necessary, or the labour time socially necessary for its production.[9] Each individual commodity, in this connexion, is to be considered as an average sample of its class.[10] Commodities, therefore, in which equal quantities of labour are embodied, or which can be produced in the same time, have the same value. The value of one commodity is to the value of any other, as the labour time necessary for the production of the one is to that necessary for the production of the other. “As values, all commodities are only definite masses of congealed labour time.”[11]

http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/wo ... 01.htm#037
Capital, Chapter 1
SECTION 1
THE TWO FACTORS OF A COMMODITY:
USE-VALUE AND VALUE
(THE SUBSTANCE OF VALUE AND THE MAGNITUDE OF VALUE)
Did I get that right? An hour of labour of the head engineer is as valuable as that of the cleaning lady? Surely not!?

regretfullySaid
Posts: 8913
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:50 pm

Re: The Great BMW Debate

Post by regretfullySaid » Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:16 pm

CROSS THE GOD DAMN STREAMS

These marshmallows and hot dogs ain't gonna roast themselves.
ImageImage

TomViolenz
Posts: 6854
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:19 pm

Re: The Great BMW Debate

Post by TomViolenz » Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:19 pm

Funk N. Furter wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost-of-pr ... y_of_value

Cost-of-production theory of value

"In economics, the cost-of-production theory of value is the theory that the price of an object or condition is determined by the sum of the cost of the resources that went into making it. The cost can comprise any of the factors of production (including labor, capital, or land) and taxation."
I guess in a Socialist society everything will be sold at cost, but in the world we live in today, that doesn't happen. That's were Galts price comes in.
In a functioning company this will be anything between the cost you mentioned and the price the market will bear.
In a non-functioning company this will be just what the market bears, no matter how much it costs to produce, so long until the company goes bankrupt.
How can we even attempt to discuss economics if not even this much is clear?

TomViolenz
Posts: 6854
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:19 pm

Re: The Great BMW Debate

Post by TomViolenz » Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:21 pm

stringtapper wrote:Both of you suck at actually debating points. (<- that's an insult… and an observation :mrgreen: )

You're ideologues hopelessly entrenched in your extreme views.

I'm pouring gasoline on this thread, locking both of you in it, and lighting a motherfucking match.

:x
8O
Would you please let me out first?! I'm just an innocent by-stander!

stringtapper
Posts: 6321
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm

Re: The Great BMW Debate

Post by stringtapper » Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:25 pm

:lol:

This forum needs an enema!

Image
Unsound Designer

Post Reply