Page 3 of 6
Re: Galt/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock/d.reamonn - politics ban
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 7:40 pm
by TomViolenz
Funk N. Furter wrote:TomViolenz wrote: You did behave rather badly in that thread.
In what way? Because I posted about the ANC's record in a thread about Mandela? Are you having a laugh? In fact I was responding to Galt's own post, plus one by the OP (Finn).
Let's see:
TomViolenz wrote:
No it's because it's a memorial thread.
Funk N. Furter wrote:
I'll fucking write you a memorial thread in a minute.
Or perhaps some pissing on a grave?
Funk N. Furter wrote:I've been in touch with Mandela through a medium, and he says "refute my arse". I'm selling the story to Paranormal Witness. I'll start another thread on it anyway.
In a memorial thread!
Funk N. Furter wrote:No, you fucking liar.
Yeah, no! I'm not having a laugh, at all

Re: Galt/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock/d.reamonn - politics ban
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 7:46 pm
by regretfullySaid
Tom, you mention dropping it and then continue to instigate. He won't drop it unless we do too.
Re: Galt/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock/d.reamonn - politics ban
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 7:47 pm
by leisuremuffin
Funk, you're right, and i'm "on your side." But you will never convince anyone here of this through any conceivable argument. What you're doing, is exactly what galt/dream/mccock/landcrab/whoever wants you to do. To flail about, making yourself look bad and turning everyone else against you. You will not "win" this argument. People will not suddenly change their minds because you post some compelling record. No matter what any of us do, this place will continue to be a nest of some of the most ignorant/sexist/racist/etc dumbfucks. However, there are also plenty of level headed good folks too. But look, I understand, sometimes the shit really gets under my skin too. I'm notorious for carrying on like a total nut when one of these complete fuckwit shitbags starts up their nonsense. But at a certain point you just have to let go and carry on. I mean, don't roll over and turn the other cheek completely, but say your piece, shoot em a dagger and then just drop it. By reacting how you're reacting your just playing into what a troll wants, you are getting wound up by obvious wind ups. I'm not defending anyone who has wronged you, i'm just saying that there really isn't much you can do and your current reaction just makes you smaller, so don't do it.
Re: Galt/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock/d.reamonn - politics ban
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 7:47 pm
by Galt
shadx312 wrote:Tom, you mention dropping it and then continue to instigate. He won't drop it unless we do too.
Don't give in to tyranny!

Re: Galt/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock/d.reamonn - politics ban
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 7:49 pm
by Galt
leisuremuffin wrote:Funk, you're right, and i'm "on your side." But you will never convince anyone here of this through any conceivable argument. What you're doing, is exactly what galt/dream/mccock/landcrab/whoever wants you to do. To flail about, making yourself look bad and turning everyone else against you. You will not "win" this argument. People will not suddenly change their minds because you post some compelling record. No matter what any of us do, this place will continue to be a nest of some of the most ignorant/sexist/racist/etc dumbfucks. However, there are also plenty of level headed good folks too. But look, I understand, sometimes the shit really gets under my skin too. I'm notorious for carrying on like a total nut when one of these complete fuckwit shitbags starts up their nonsense. But at a certain point you just have to let go and carry on. I mean, don't roll over and turn the other cheek completely, but say your piece, shoot em a dagger and then just drop it. By reacting how you're reacting your just playing into what a troll wants, you are getting wound up by obvious wind ups. I'm not defending anyone who has wronged you, i'm just saying that there really isn't much you can do and your current reaction just makes you smaller, so don't do it.
I vote we make you moderator.

Re: Galt/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock/d.reamonn - politics ban
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 7:49 pm
by TomViolenz
shadx312 wrote:Tom, you mention dropping it and then continue to instigate. He won't drop it unless we do too.
Point taken, I'll drop it now.
Re: Galt/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock/d.reamonn - politics ban
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 9:52 pm
by Machinesworking
Galt wrote:leisuremuffin wrote: But at a certain point you just have to let go and carry on. I mean, don't roll over and turn the other cheek completely, but say your piece, shoot em a dagger and then just drop it. By reacting how you're reacting your just playing into what a troll wants, you are getting wound up by obvious wind ups. I'm not defending anyone who has wronged you, i'm just saying that there really isn't much you can do and your current reaction just makes you smaller, so don't do it.
I vote we make you moderator.

I second this.
Great explanation of what to do when someone won't stop a useless online debate.
Re: Galt/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock/d.reamonn - politics ban
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 10:28 pm
by TomViolenz
Funk N. Furter wrote:
Funk N. Furter wrote:
I'll fucking write you a memorial thread in a minute.
I thought that was pretty witty myself. But you never do understand jokes do you?
Just one note: When you offend, it's always a joke that the other person didn't understand and you always manage to even point to it in a condescending manner. But if one just dares to criticize you, all hell breaks lose.
But I dropped it, so no further discussion from me.
Re: Galt/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock/d.reamonn - politics ban
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 11:48 pm
by regretfullySaid
So much drama in the LBC
Re: Galt/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock/d.reamonn - politics ban
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 7:55 pm
by H20nly
Re: Galt/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock/d.reamonn - politics ban
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:17 am
by TAINTLICK
THIS THREAD IS THE BEST EVER. I REALLY LIKE THE PART WHEN SOMEONE TRIES TO ACTUALLY REASON WITH FUNKEN AND TALK TO HIM AS IF HE'LL ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND.
I LOVE YOU GUYS.
*HUGS*
Re: Galt/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock/d.reamonn - politics ban
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 7:49 am
by Galt
You shouldn't use capitals so much—it looks like your yelling, so people are going to think that your angry...
Re: Galt/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock/d.reamonn - politics ban
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:30 am
by TomViolenz
TAINTLICK wrote:THIS THREAD IS THE BEST EVER. I REALLY LIKE THE PART WHEN SOMEONE TRIES TO ACTUALLY REASON WITH FUNKEN AND TALK TO HIM AS IF HE'LL ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND.
I LOVE YOU GUYS.
*HUGS*
RETRACK THIS RUBBISH
OR ELSE

Re: Galt/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock/d.reamonn - politics ban
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:31 am
by TomViolenz
Galt wrote:You shouldn't use capitals so much—it looks like your yelling, so people are going to think that your angry...
No, he just LOVES US ALL VERY MUCH!!!

Re: Galt/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock/d.reamonn - politics ban
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:25 pm
by stringtapper
Galt wrote:You shouldn't use capitals so much—it looks like your yelling, so people are going to think that your angry...
YOU'RE
