Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:39 pm
dj superflat wrote:

Pardon me if i digress a bit. But It's nice to hear someone who comes from the laptop side of things, "get it"(dj superflat). I come from the pro audio/studio side. Faithfulness to gear/software is a scary thought. It's a big freakin orgy anyway and it should be. If you could tell what a track was made on just by listening to it then we would have some real problems to debate about concerning these issues. Or how about this; lets say one has faithfully used a program or gear for a long time and convinced others it's the way to go by proving there mastery on said program in written word. What would you say if the music made by that person wasn't very good? You would change your mind in a second! In music creation the ends truly justifies the means in the most positive sense. Just listen to Cody Chestnutt's "headphone masterpiece". An over zealous opinion about a program is a fart in the wind. It's kind of like convincing someone you know the best way to masturbate. Forget faithful, be a slut and don't spank the monkey too much.some people love to fiddle with all sorts of FX, others just want to plug the right guitar into the right amp and go. similarly, some folk make incredbile records with gameboys, an incredibly underpowered mac laptop from back in the day or whatever, others have the sick work station with a cinema display, etc