Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 7:41 pm
Shuffle.
Ableton Forum
Sasha techniques! (Pic incl.)
Page 3 of 4
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 7:47 pm
well done!
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 7:47 pm
make that Party Shuffle
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 8:18 pm
ahhh, it looks like sasha has brought the ableton users closer together again.
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 9:13 pm
he just wanted to share the moment with Richie ('s pic in this case) 
...
he couldn't do that in Live, didn't he?
w
... he couldn't do that in Live, didn't he?
w
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 5:53 am
no one really knows do they? thats why the majority of you are taking the piss, come on some one should have a point of view that has something to do with live?
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 7:53 am
its incredible how many shitty dj's we have down here that get paid so much money to do shit.
if anyone lives down here in south florida and goes to the hardrock
those fucks at gryphon get about 900 dollars to gig that fucking place a night.
if anyone lives down here in south florida and goes to the hardrock
those fucks at gryphon get about 900 dollars to gig that fucking place a night.
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 7:57 am
i'd bet they make more money than the people who make the records they play.
.lm.
.lm.
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 2:34 pm
Shit man..... I bet you are right. That really is such a drag. I'd also bet that half of them get all pissed off and cover up their records when people come up to train-spot. All of that stuff really burns me up (and I DJ). I feel that in 99.9% of the cases there is absolutely no reason for that crap.
The artist who made the record deserves recognition, their work is not some "secret weapon".
I recently grabbed a pretty banging set by Troy Pierce, but was pretty irritated because he refused to release the playlist. I was like, thats bullshit and bashed that mentality on a public forum. Turns out that a lot of the tracks were either unreleased or unsigned and the artists requested that he not release the playlist. That is really the only valid reason I can see for a dj not divulging what they are playing.
Anyway, totally agree. A lot of aspects of Dj culture really annoy the hell out of me and I totally agree with your statement on the dance music scene in general that you made earlier.
The artist who made the record deserves recognition, their work is not some "secret weapon".
I recently grabbed a pretty banging set by Troy Pierce, but was pretty irritated because he refused to release the playlist. I was like, thats bullshit and bashed that mentality on a public forum. Turns out that a lot of the tracks were either unreleased or unsigned and the artists requested that he not release the playlist. That is really the only valid reason I can see for a dj not divulging what they are playing.
Anyway, totally agree. A lot of aspects of Dj culture really annoy the hell out of me and I totally agree with your statement on the dance music scene in general that you made earlier.
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:14 pm
I would say that there are some duplicate channels in there. Also there are bound to be adjacent channels with segments of tracks/pre set loops (???). Also does Sasha not remix a lot of folks music with live like he did on the involver album? This would also explain why you may want to colour code certain aspects. To be honest, fuck knows.
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:12 pm
I am sure they do.leisuremuffin wrote:i'd bet they make more money than the people who make the records they play.
.lm.
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:22 pm
I pee alot when i get nervous. 
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:27 pm
i know exactly how much sasha gets per gig and you could buy a pretty decent car for that sum of money.Mike Goodwin wrote:I am sure they do.leisuremuffin wrote:i'd bet they make more money than the people who make the records they play.
.lm.
to be honest its absurd, but cool at the same time..
when i seee vids of sasha and diggers in i think brazil at that big festival, i see two guys who are like 'wtf we doin here man?' .. 'i dont know just play something else, anything'
Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 7:29 am
I'm not a big fun of Sasha.
But as far as I know, his gigs sound quality is pretty good as well as other named dj compare to opening act.
It is always obvious whether or not he spins because of that.
( I can tell the choice of songs anyway though).
Is the main reason of the sound quality his engineer?
But as far as I know, his gigs sound quality is pretty good as well as other named dj compare to opening act.
It is always obvious whether or not he spins because of that.
( I can tell the choice of songs anyway though).
Is the main reason of the sound quality his engineer?
Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:23 am
bah can't believe I'm posting on a sasha thread again.......
About the everything being set to A on the xfade......
I believe he does this so that crossfading leaves only the effects sends in
the mix, while fading back brings back in the uneffected sound of the
tracks...... u know how he over-uses those big wet mix delay swells....
-Ben
About the everything being set to A on the xfade......
I believe he does this so that crossfading leaves only the effects sends in
the mix, while fading back brings back in the uneffected sound of the
tracks...... u know how he over-uses those big wet mix delay swells....
-Ben