Page 3 of 4
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 5:02 pm
by signal
I beta tested the pre-release of version 1 as well. From the first time I opened the program, it felt so much more natural than any experience I'd had with Cubase VST or Acid *cringes* up to that point.
I was so stoked about session view that I did everything I could to spend as much time there as possible for the first year or so, printing multitracks only at the last possible moment. Come to think of it, I still do that.
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 5:04 pm
by Machinate
signal wrote:I beta tested the pre-release of version 1 as well. From the first time I opened the program, it felt so much more natural than any experience I'd had with Cubase VST or Acid *cringes* up to that point.
I was so stoked about session view that I did everything I could to spend as much time there as possible for the first year or so, printing multitracks only at the last possible moment. Come to think of it, I still do that.
Same here, only I didn't start until v3
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 5:14 pm
by signal
I'm trying to remember how I originally heard about Live. It was likely the Monolake connection. I must have read an interview with Henke or Behles where something was mentioned about the program's pending release.
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 6:39 pm
by evon
forge wrote:
I used Live 1.5 delta (came with M-Audio card) then instantly upgraded to Live 2
Same here, except I don't think I upgraded instantly. Also got Reason Adapted and a few more software in the bundle. It was my experience with Cakewalk however, that whetted my appetite. The GUI in Live seems quite similar Cakewalk if I remember correctly.
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 6:43 pm
by dcease
i didn't own a fucking computer, so hell no. what, do the v.1 users deserve a cookie or something

Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 6:48 pm
by Tone Deft
dcease wrote:i didn't own a fucking computer, so hell no. what, do the v.1 users deserve a cookie or something

no, you get the cookie for whiner of the year. open wide, I got a big shit cookie for ya right here.
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 6:55 pm
by beatpoet
Poster wrote:Live v. -0.1a2

Looks like 'Southpark' Live

Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 6:59 pm
by dcease
eh, just some chocolate bannanas...

Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 7:15 pm
by dcease
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 12:43 am
by forge
noisetonepause wrote:stringtapper wrote:Poster wrote:Live v. -0.1a2
Looks suspiciously like something built in Max!
It wasn't.
I thought the prototype was? that screenshot was 0.1a2 - probably a prototype
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 1:42 am
by bensuthers
yes. I used Live 1. I didn't stop using Logic until Live 3 though.
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 5:40 am
by bennymcfarlane
Poster wrote:Live v. -0.1a2
Oh Wow, thanks for posting that screenshot! so cool!
My good friend showed me this program when it was on V.3 - it had just been updated to version 3. Oh the music that we made!
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 8:02 am
by noisetonepause
forge wrote:I thought the prototype was? that screenshot was 0.1a2 - probably a prototype
Nah, it's a myth. I'd dig up Robert's post about it but I can't be fucked.
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 9:02 am
by Poster
forge wrote:
I thought the prototype was? that screenshot was 0.1a2 - probably a prototype
I just made that up
I'm not sure which version that actually is..
monolake.de wrote:Ableton Live, pre-release, summer 2000
Robert' Flickr page wrote:Screenshot of a an early (pre initial release) version of Ableton Live
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 9:09 am
by xrayfish
I got into it via 'Steinberg Remix' which got top marks in a Computer Music review. This was essentially Live 1 but crippled in many ways (track counts etc), but it only cost £25. Once hooked I forked out for Live 1.5 and have been throwing money at it ever since.