What does a stone sound like?

[scott nathaniel]

[
Quit including yourself with the 'other Europeans.' We're the only people who are reading you. We're your only firends. No-one 'over-there' is aware of your presence. You're here in the Ableton forum, all day every-day! You're not yucking it up with your compadres. You're not part of any revolution or grand-scale awareness; you're only here, with us.

So what? Am I a "loser"?

All I know is that you are no better than us and no worse.

[myrnova]

i hate to be the other one to tell you this... but you're misusing the word if any of that is true. your European friends are either all idiots or you don't really have many European friends and are just making up what they think.

those people in the images i posted are not angloamericans... and would all laugh in your face if you told them they were... except Frank Zappa because he's dead.

I guess they don't speak italian, right? Zappa didn't for sure. They all speak english. So they are ANGLOAMERICANI. If in the U.S. "angloamerican" means "white race" it is not my fault Here this kind of "classification" ended when Mussolini was killed by partisans THIS is what "angloamericans" means in italian: people whose mother tongue is english.

[scott nathaniel]

i hate to be the other one to tell you this... but you're misusing the word if any of that is true. your European friends are either all idiots or you don't really have many European friends and are just making up what they think.

those people in the images i posted are not angloamericans... and would all laugh in your face if you told them they were... except Frank Zappa because he's dead.

I guess they don't speak italian, right? Zappa didn't for sure. They all speak english. So they are ANGLOAMERICANI. If in the U.S. "angloamerican" means "white race" it is not my fault Here this kind of "classification" ended when Mussolini was killed by partisans

We're more efficient here, I suppose. Otherwise we would be calling you Roman-Italians. But that would be fuck-witted. I guess we're not fuck-wits!

[myrnova]

i hate to be the other one to tell you this... but you're misusing the word if any of that is true. your European friends are either all idiots or you don't really have many European friends and are just making up what they think.

those people in the images i posted are not angloamericans... and would all laugh in your face if you told them they were... except Frank Zappa because he's dead.

I guess they don't speak italian, right? Zappa didn't for sure. They all speak english. So they are ANGLOAMERICANI. If in the U.S. "angloamerican" means "white race" it is not my fault Here this kind of "classification" ended when Mussolini was killed by partisans

We're more efficient here, I suppose. Otherwise we would be calling you Roman-Italians. But that would be fuck-witted. I guess we're not fuck-wits!

mmm... my suggestion: open a history book sometimes

[myrnova]

So what? Am I a "loser"?

All I know is that you are no better than us and no worse.

"than US"...

[H20nly]

You're the only one arguing with anyone posting. You're also the only one abusing the English language.

[myrnova]

Wrong. For instance, I never argue with FnF and Bagatell. The rest is "US" (i guess you mean "WE, the angloamerican right ones" or smth" )

The reason is plain: you cannot accept some truths about your land. In my opinion, this is due to war nationalist propaganda (very powerful in the States).

[scott nathaniel]

Wrong. For instance, I never argue with FnF and Bagatell. The rest is "US" (i guess you mean "WE, the angloamerican right ones" or smth" )

The reason is plain: you cannot accept some truths about your land. In my opinion, this is due to war nationalist propaganda (very powerful in the States).

Are you not the one whose entire argument is based upon an "us(Europeans) vs them(USA). You are really audacious enough to call foul on a tactic that is your MO or "smth" <---you really need to abstain from this abbreviation-- it's fuck-witted

[myrnova]

Well, actually the "US" joke derives from this:

angloamericans 16

moderator: USA
H20nly: USA
docprosper: USA
stringtapper: USA
shadx312: USA
scott nathaniel: USA
Seriously: USA
Machineworking: USA
Taintlick: USA
Hanil Yoo: USA
lowshelf: UK
cmcpress: UK
crofter: UK
the finn: South Africa
Davo: New Zealand
Forge: Australia
myrnova: Italy
bagatell: Spain

TOTAL: 16 angloamericans out of 18 users. All of them angry and/or shocked about my statements. Most of them trolling (because desperate?)

It's not "me against U.S.", it's you against me. Infact, I just answer to your questions.

[scott nathaniel]

I'm trying to figure out why you guys pay attention to threads like this?

13 pages later and I'm still embedded. I think I'm trying to get Myrnova to admit I'm right or "smth". I can't think of any other valid motive.

[crumhorn]

[scott nathaniel]

^
Myrnova's favorite band: The Eye-Rolling Stones.

[sporkles]

myrnova, could you just briefly state your aim with this thread? You've already communicated your opinion that there is a schism between 'music' and the 'sound' that results from the music. It's not hard to grasp, we all get what you're saying. It's just that nobody really gives a fuck. Speaking of the sound that emanates from our loudspeakers after the radio hosts have announced an artist name and a song title as 'music' is simply practical.

In what type of social context do find it useful or necessary to insist upon the difference between music and sound?

Then, of course - maybe as an attempt to strengthen your points, I don't know - you go ahead and brazenly declare that Europeans know this difference, while Americans don't. Then you proceed to get completely caught up in my use of the word "we" in my entirely facetious comment which referenced the previous thread on the topic (which also went nowhere), and in the process label me an "angloamerican" without any basis (I'm neither "anglo" nor American). I'm not even going to get into your attempt to lecture the rest of the world on the meaning of English words and your complete failure to see the irony in your bigoted world view when you label Americans as slow-witted racist warmongers.

I just want to know:

What is your mission, man?

[crofter]

myrnova, could you just briefly state your aim with this thread? You've already communicated your opinion that there is a schism between 'music' and the 'sound' that results from the music. It's not hard to grasp, we all get what you're saying. It's just that nobody really gives a fuck. Speaking of the sound that emanates from our loudspeakers after the radio hosts have announced an artist name and a song title as 'music' is simply practical.

In what type of social context do find it useful or necessary to insist upon the difference between music and sound?

Then, of course - maybe as an attempt to strengthen your points, I don't know - you go ahead and brazenly declare that Europeans know this difference, while Americans don't. Then you proceed to get completely caught up in my use of the word "we" in my entirely facetious comment which referenced the previous thread on the topic (which also went nowhere), and in the process label me an "angloamerican" without any basis (I'm neither "anglo" nor American). I'm not even going to get into your attempt to lecture the rest of the world on the meaning of English words and your complete failure to see the irony in your bigoted world view when you label Americans as slow-witted racist warmongers.

I just want to know:

What is your mission, man?

He's trying to brainwash us.

[myrnova]

myrnova, could you just briefly state your aim with this thread? You've already communicated your opinion that there is a schism between 'music' and the 'sound' that results from the music. It's not hard to grasp, we all get what you're saying. It's just that nobody really gives a fuck. Speaking of the sound that emanates from our loudspeakers after the radio hosts have announced an artist name and a song title as 'music' is simply practical.

In what type of social context do find it useful or necessary to insist upon the difference between music and sound?

Then, of course - maybe as an attempt to strengthen your points, I don't know - you go ahead and brazenly declare that Europeans know this difference, while Americans don't. Then you proceed to get completely caught up in my use of the word "we" in my entirely facetious comment which referenced the previous thread on the topic (which also went nowhere), and in the process label me an "angloamerican" without any basis (I'm neither "anglo" nor American). I'm not even going to get into your attempt to lecture the rest of the world on the meaning of English words and your complete failure to see the irony in your bigoted world view when you label Americans as slow-witted racist warmongers.

I just want to know:

What is your mission, man?

My "aim" is double:

(1) to demonstrate that "timbre" is not an element of music, as americans here claim (and that is why they keep on calling sound "music").
(2) to prove they are trolling me because they cannot accept my antiamericanism (they call it "prejudice" or whatever)

So, once I will eventually be banned by the american moderator, it will be the umpteenth prove I was right, both on american arrogance (americans here are 89% and behave like they are "the masters", typical yankee attitude: mocking foreign people habits, laughing for their mistakes in english, talking about idiot american tv shows or idiot movies that we ignore in 8 topics out of 10, etc.). Of course, I proved I was right on music, too (which has nothing to do with "timbre modification", as americans claim).