i see, whats the best work around for this in live have you been using?bog wrote:Yeah, I think that describes me as well. I have used hardware like the electribe and MPCs and while I appreciate what they are, I've come to realize that they're too limited for me and that's why I've decided on a software setup based on Live. The main reason for choosing Live for me (and I'm sure many others as well) was the session view. Up til now, I knew of no other software program with a non-linear pattern sequencer like Live's session view, other than FL Studio which I can't use because I'm on a mac. But Live has disappointed me with its inherent limitation of not being able to record automation in the session view.starving student wrote:i think if you're someone who does not want to use anything but the computer that maschine is for that person, it would help the computer feel more like an instrument
And now, looking at Maschine, I feel like it IS serious competition for someone like me who's main interest in Live is the session view style workflow. I don't care that much about follow actions or other Live exclusive session view features. All I really want is to be able to simply record controller movements while in a session view-like environment, and Maschine does this. And Maschine has a built-in hardware step sequencer. Live users would need APC40 and Max for Live whenever it comes out in order to accomplish that. Knowing what I know now, I probably would have gone for Maschine instead of buying Live.
i didn't know that about maschine that would definitely peak my intrest.