+1SubFunk wrote:the problem with logic is, that for the price tag it's still well worth it for the quality of the plugs alone... .
yeah I'm seriously tempted - for $500 if I had it spare I'd consider it
+1SubFunk wrote:the problem with logic is, that for the price tag it's still well worth it for the quality of the plugs alone... .
that's funny - I've thought the same thing. this forum has tons more personality...kind of like the software....although I agree that Live and Logic have different strengths and I don't love the idea of Ableton trying to become the all in one solution....logicprohelp.com is a very good forum as well, no fun at all but helpful and full of real depth knowledge.
Give Apple a call. Well worth putting in a little time on hold, they usually make good in cases where you bought the old version less than a month ago.OvertoneZero wrote:I bought Logic Studio 20 days ago, hmph
trilo wrote:Give Apple a call. Well worth putting in a little time on hold, they usually make good in cases where you bought the old version less than a month ago.OvertoneZero wrote:I bought Logic Studio 20 days ago, hmph
This would seal the deal for me, I am constantly running out of juice on my core 2 duo 2.4ghz MBP when it comes to the end of a track in Live 8. If I can squeeze a substantial more bit of grunt out of my CPU with Logic, I'm all over it.trilo wrote:
It's a 32-bit Intel app. Runs well, and seems much better on resources. In Logic Pro 8 if I ran something complicated or a couple dozen tracks, I could occasionally find myself facing the 'overload' warning. This time around I had a few background apps running and was able to play all the demo tracks without a hitch (Lily Allen's The Fear, The Killers' Spaceman, and Santigold's You'll Find A Way Remix). The Killers track gave it a real workout, not even going past the halfway point on the CPU or HD load meter despite it being 81 tracks and me playing around in the mixer while the track played.
That, is Logics strong point, it was CPU efficient as hell when it was mac/PC, and it still is now that it's OSX only. In Logic 7 VS Live 5 it was brutal, probably not as much as that now, but Live could only get about 60% of the CPU that Logic could. It's still probably at least 20% more efficient. From what people told me, this has to do with Logic not poling the tracks with plug ins on them constantly like Live does, since it's not geared towards live performance like Live is.timothyallan wrote:This would seal the deal for me, I am constantly running out of juice on my core 2 duo 2.4ghz MBP when it comes to the end of a track in Live 8. If I can squeeze a substantial more bit of grunt out of my CPU with Logic, I'm all over it.trilo wrote:
It's a 32-bit Intel app. Runs well, and seems much better on resources. In Logic Pro 8 if I ran something complicated or a couple dozen tracks, I could occasionally find myself facing the 'overload' warning. This time around I had a few background apps running and was able to play all the demo tracks without a hitch (Lily Allen's The Fear, The Killers' Spaceman, and Santigold's You'll Find A Way Remix). The Killers track gave it a real workout, not even going past the halfway point on the CPU or HD load meter despite it being 81 tracks and me playing around in the mixer while the track played.
trilo wrote:The Killers track gave it a real workout, not even going past the halfway point on the CPU or HD load meter despite it being 81 tracks and me playing around in the mixer while the track played.