Page 4 of 4

Re: live is not sample accurate!

Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 6:19 pm
by abort
Such linear thinking for being "artist's" ...compensate and move on to bigger and brighter, or darker and eviler things shall we?

:D :(

Re: live is not sample accurate!

Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 6:19 pm
by stringtapper
Tone Deft wrote:
stringtapper wrote:I have an inkling that when M4L comes out you'll probably find out who cares and why it may matter.
why?
Because if M4L is going to be able to control things like Live's transport by using audio rate control this might foreshadow an issue. I'm not completely sure, but it sounds plausible.

Re: live is not sample accurate!

Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 6:26 pm
by Tone Deft
stringtapper wrote:
Tone Deft wrote:
stringtapper wrote:I have an inkling that when M4L comes out you'll probably find out who cares and why it may matter.
why?
Because if M4L is going to be able to control things like Live's transport by using audio rate control this might foreshadow an issue. I'm not completely sure, but it sounds plausible.
not sure I follow. seems it's an issue with bouncing between tracks in arrange view, sometimes. maybe I'll look into it tonight.


I can't wait to see the problems/complaints/questions once Live users get a hold of max/msp, it's going to get ugly around here.

Re: live is not sample accurate!

Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 7:13 pm
by mr.adl
Tone Deft wrote:I understand your tone now. glad you're not having problems but as users shouldn't we pick our battles when it comes to emphasizing bug fixes?
Na, that´s not what i meant. :)

peace

Re: live is not sample accurate!

Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 7:15 pm
by Tone Deft
my bad. I came into this thinking people were ranting about this, they're not.