Limitations of M4L (e.g. rack access)

Learn about building and using Max for Live devices.
skwosh
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:29 am

Re: Limitations of M4L

Post by skwosh » Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:31 am

Time for another bump. Perhaps this has been resolved?

From the original post, back in March 2010:
skwosh wrote:Navigating from this_device within a rack. Trying to do anything with said live.object seems to fail. Which means I can't write device helpers (e.g. revamping Sampler) that can be grouped or used inside a drum rack.
From my last post, back in November 2010:
skwosh wrote:
pukunui wrote:Yeah, you're right, we need to deal with racks better in the API. I'll amend the tickets with this detail.
Just wondering if the rack access thing has been resolved (#1 on the list), or whether it is likely to be resolved soon...

Macrostructure
Posts: 665
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 2:51 pm

Re: Limitations of M4L (e.g. rack access)

Post by Macrostructure » Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:55 am

Yes it has :)

Palmer Eldritch
Posts: 525
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Universe>Earth>Europe>Germany

Re: Limitations of M4L (e.g. rack access)

Post by Palmer Eldritch » Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:58 am

Hi skwosh,

since Live 8.2.2 and Max 5.1.8 there is fully access to and from racks (beside of other improvements in regard to m4l).

Cheers, palmer
Live 8_3_4 + 4b7_32+64 -Suite- Max4Live 5_1_9 _ core2DuoMacBook 2*2,16 Ghz + external FW HD _ OSX 10.6.8 _ 3G RAM _ M.H. MIO 2882 + 5.4d208 Driver _ Faderfox LV1 _ Akai MPK25 _ Logitec wheel mouse _______ PeacE will be the SOLution of LIVE

skwosh
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:29 am

Re: Limitations of M4L (e.g. rack access)

Post by skwosh » Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:07 am

Brilliant! Thanks a lot guys...

Post Reply