Page 4 of 4

Re: Limitations of M4L

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:31 am
by skwosh
Time for another bump. Perhaps this has been resolved?

From the original post, back in March 2010:
skwosh wrote:Navigating from this_device within a rack. Trying to do anything with said live.object seems to fail. Which means I can't write device helpers (e.g. revamping Sampler) that can be grouped or used inside a drum rack.
From my last post, back in November 2010:
skwosh wrote:
pukunui wrote:Yeah, you're right, we need to deal with racks better in the API. I'll amend the tickets with this detail.
Just wondering if the rack access thing has been resolved (#1 on the list), or whether it is likely to be resolved soon...

Re: Limitations of M4L (e.g. rack access)

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:55 am
by Macrostructure
Yes it has :)

Re: Limitations of M4L (e.g. rack access)

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:58 am
by Palmer Eldritch
Hi skwosh,

since Live 8.2.2 and Max 5.1.8 there is fully access to and from racks (beside of other improvements in regard to m4l).

Cheers, palmer

Re: Limitations of M4L (e.g. rack access)

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:07 am
by skwosh
Brilliant! Thanks a lot guys...