I hope they do a trial for 2 to 4 weeks WITH saving; I think I'd be more likely to end up buying something if I needed to load up a project made during trial

Again, what makes you believe that Bitwig would announce the price to some random european retailer but not to the general public?HeadrickProductions wrote:Joke is probably a bad way to put it. For a company with low overhead (8 employees and a start up grant), who have made a product that is very similar to live with some improvements (they even are going to have a suite version), one would think that they would under cut their competition and not take them head on. At the very east offer corssgrades for ableton users. I am not saying that they have a cheap product but with the amount of cracked software out there a company needs to make it cheap enough for people to buy and not crack. Also this is version one. I would think that it was a massive task to create the software from the ground up, which means there has to be issues. That with the fact that the exciting stuff is in version 2 I would have priced version one cheaper, but then again what the hell do I know. I even sent a former professor (I'm a business geek...best way to make cash) to see if i'm way off base and just want a cheap price, or if theory backs this up.
As long as this is not ableton live 9 then things are great because it is competition that WILL drive down price (unless there has been collusion which is a possibility), and cause both companies to work hard.
Live 9 upgrade most likely has my name on it
but the thing is, they may have added those requests, but they can't possibly have added everything Live has in that time. Once you start using BWS you would quickly discover all the things it is lacking.fx23 wrote:i don't catch the joke, for me 360e is fair and descent price. it's not an ipad toy app or a tiny daw, it s basically Live rewrited with all features we asked over 10years. i was thinking it
would cost even more..when you see vsts costing 200e, 360e for an ultimate (on paper) daw is ridiculous price imo.
Why even say this without proof? Seriously, I'm sure there will be something that some user will want that BWS does not have, but to blanket statement like that off of a splash video and a few features mentioned that Bitwig obviously thought would get people from the Live, Logic, etc. camp excited is exactly the type of projecting that is beyond silly.Forge. wrote: Once you start using BWS you would quickly discover all the things it is lacking.
you got Live back at the start didn't you? It didn't even have an arrange view at version 1.Machinesworking wrote:Why even say this without proof? Seriously, I'm sure there will be something that some user will want that BWS does not have, but to blanket statement like that off of a splash video and a few features mentioned that Bitwig obviously thought would get people from the Live, Logic, etc. camp excited is exactly the type of projecting that is beyond silly.Forge. wrote: Once you start using BWS you would quickly discover all the things it is lacking.
I see what you did there.timothyallan wrote:Me too, ever since Apple become the majority shareholder in Bitwig last month, it's been a constant guessing game!!
Tail end of version 3, got the upgrade to 4 for $50. Couldn't see using it until I decided to start p[laying live and hated using Logic for that.Forge. wrote:you got Live back at the start didn't you? It didn't even have an arrange view at version 1.
Close, I said they should offer it at a cheaper price than standard, but that it's not weird or unusual for them to offer it at the standard price.I'm not saying it won't offer something over Live, I just personally doubt it could be worth 360E at version 1. Especially like I said with Logic now $200.
Didn't you actually say the same thing in this thread?