Re: Apple Mac : why it is going to be bad for pro sofwares soon
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:04 pm
Applecare is irrelevant. If MBP's are now becoming unreliable and I can't trust it to do what I use it for (I'm not the only person I know to have problems with MBPs lately), I have to look at alternatives to make sure I can carry on doing what I do.Stromkraft wrote:We buy Applecare for all our units. That's 3 years of service in total.Sage wrote:The problem with Apple is more to do with the hardware rather than the OS.
My MBP basically stopped working for the second time within a few months a couple of nights back while on stage. The very reason I started using Apple was for reliability, if there is no guarantee of that, the sooner I jump ship, the better. When the last failure happened, Apple's idea of customer service turned out to be severely poor, if I had stuck with the official Apple route, would have been looking at weeks, possibly months just for a repair.
You still have the second hand service market for out of warranty machines. There's also a huge knowledgeable community out there willing to give advice if you want to do repairs yourself.
Overall, having used or owned several MBPs and MPs I've seen very few go down, also in companies we are working with. I think you find other machines aren't necessarily better. But why not check out the any of the purpose-built music computers that some computer builder companies sell? If nothing else you save a lot of time putting them together with a minimum of surprises.
Which happens to be why I use OS X for music production. but that's not the only choice.
Nebula, which is a processor gobbler, can use a GPU that supports CUDA (it's a tricky business though):Machinesworking wrote: Don't know of any plug ins supporting graphics card cpu use?
Selection bias. It's an interesting thing, as soon as a consumer has a problem with something they find intolerable, they will find information that backs their feeling on a subject.Sage wrote: Applecare is irrelevant. If MBP's are now becoming unreliable and I can't trust it to do what I use it for (I'm not the only person I know to have problems with MBPs lately), I have to look at alternatives to make sure I can carry on doing what I do.
I've never had problems in the past either and been using Apple for years, but there does appear to be an increase in the amount of problems they had and it was a touch alarming going to the Apple stores in London and all stores were booked solid for weeks to see someone about repairing their Apple products. Surely that should suggest something about how many people are experiencing unreliability with Apple?
That's your problem, not Apple's.Stromkraft wrote:Media production companies care. There hasn't been a Mac Pro yet that didn't make the company I work for a lot of money. We use Windows 8 PCs too, but the TOC with the Macs are way lower.pencilrocket wrote:MacPro? Who cares? It doesn't provide enough money to run a large company.
People whining about Macs usually have no idea on what people and companies out there are creating with them.
Good luck with reparing 3 years old defected products.Stromkraft wrote:We buy Applecare for all our units. That's 3 years of service in total. You still have the second hand service market for out of warranty machines. There's also a huge knowledgeable community out there willing to give advice if you want to do repairs yourself.
Dude iDevices are for your Mom and Grandma... smhStromkraft wrote:A Retina iMac is probably a more obvious choice than a 4-core Mac Pro.
I haven't followed this closely, but even as music hardware and software makers have sung that song when I had issues, I have yet to see anyone convincingly explain why that would have been in the first place.beats me wrote: Early on there were reports that Fusion drives had issues with audio production software. Is that still the case?
Yeah, right. Your grandma probably couldn't.pencilrocket wrote: Good luck with reparing 3 years old defected products.
https://discussions.apple.com/message/2 ... 0#26993135
No, that's your comprehension problem.pencilrocket wrote:That's your problem, not Apple's.Stromkraft wrote:Media production companies care. There hasn't been a Mac Pro yet that didn't make the company I work for a lot of money. We use Windows 8 PCs too, but the TOC with the Macs are way lower.pencilrocket wrote:MacPro? Who cares? It doesn't provide enough money to run a large company.
People whining about Macs usually have no idea on what people and companies out there are creating with them.
the way they work is quite different. the all-in-one hybrid drives use a small amount of flash memory as a file cache.Stromkraft wrote:I haven't followed this closely, but even as music hardware and software makers have sung that song when I had issues, I have yet to see anyone convincingly explain why that would have been in the first place.beats me wrote: Early on there were reports that Fusion drives had issues with audio production software. Is that still the case?
I have an SSD-Hybrid and not a Fusion Drive and, in the conversations with some of these makers, it was never suggested to affect the issues I had.
I know all that, but from a music production system use level, the Fusion drive is an SSD. As there haven't been a convincing case presented to me from a manufacturer or anyone else that show that Fusion drives cause audio issues, I remain unconvinced.fishmonkey wrote:the way they work is quite different. the all-in-one hybrid drives use a small amount of flash memory as a file cache.Stromkraft wrote:I haven't followed this closely, but even as music hardware and software makers have sung that song when I had issues, I have yet to see anyone convincingly explain why that would have been in the first place.beats me wrote: Early on there were reports that Fusion drives had issues with audio production software. Is that still the case?
I have an SSD-Hybrid and not a Fusion Drive and, in the conversations with some of these makers, it was never suggested to affect the issues I had.
the Fusion drive setup works on a block level..
That's completely wrong, typical for armchair engineersH20nly wrote:that's why they stopped it. Apple wants the huge profit they're making by raping their customers on RAM upfront
you are arguing in strange little circles. a Fusion Drive setup is not the same as a hybrid drive. and i don't even know what you mean by "the Fusion drive is an SSD".Stromkraft wrote: I know all that, but from a music production system use level, the Fusion drive is an SSD. As there haven't been a convincing case presented to me from a manufacturer or anyone else that show that Fusion drives cause audio issues, I remain unconvinced.
There can of course be interactions and bugs connected to that, but usually that kind of problems can be solved when these manufacturers "work with Apple" as they state it. If that means what it should mean.
There's been a lot of hot air and hearsay and jumping to conclusions, but the fact remains that many people have Fusion drives and carry on making music without any issues at all.