Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 6:59 am
Live lite?pepezabala wrote: I know people who are working in theatre, dance etc. and ask me for a tool for arranging their music. A "reduced" version of live would be perfect for them.
.
Live lite?pepezabala wrote: I know people who are working in theatre, dance etc. and ask me for a tool for arranging their music. A "reduced" version of live would be perfect for them.
.
you are probably right.forge wrote:Live lite?pepezabala wrote: I know people who are working in theatre, dance etc. and ask me for a tool for arranging their music. A "reduced" version of live would be perfect for them.
.
maybe a custom version of live for every customer that buys it. you specify which features you want and then they add it all up on a cash register and ask you to swipe your card?pepezabala wrote:but honestly, Live 6 is the first version that made a little confused.
I could explain live 3 to my mom and she would get it without ever having worked with digital audio.
If I would show live 6 to someone who never worked with live, I believe that only the huge number of different features would confuse you.
I like that all those features exist in the ableton way, but I also already thought that there should be a "beginners edition" or "beginners mode", something like live 3, but with mp3 support, controller-surfaces, freeze and some other stuff that came with the newer versions. But without midi-instruments, racks, sampler and operator.
I think there are lots of people out there that just need to arrange audiofiles. I know people who are working in theatre, dance etc. and ask me for a tool for arranging their music. A "reduced" version of live would be perfect for them.
Now you might say "let them use garageband" - but in my opinion the gui of garageband sucks a lot, and live's gui is excellent for it's easy-to-understand-approach. And garageband does not have something like session view.
sounds like FLStudio!Johnisfaster wrote:maybe a custom version of live for every customer that buys it. you specify which features you want and then they add it all up on a cash register and ask you to swipe your card?pepezabala wrote:but honestly, Live 6 is the first version that made a little confused.
I could explain live 3 to my mom and she would get it without ever having worked with digital audio.
If I would show live 6 to someone who never worked with live, I believe that only the huge number of different features would confuse you.
I like that all those features exist in the ableton way, but I also already thought that there should be a "beginners edition" or "beginners mode", something like live 3, but with mp3 support, controller-surfaces, freeze and some other stuff that came with the newer versions. But without midi-instruments, racks, sampler and operator.
I think there are lots of people out there that just need to arrange audiofiles. I know people who are working in theatre, dance etc. and ask me for a tool for arranging their music. A "reduced" version of live would be perfect for them.
Now you might say "let them use garageband" - but in my opinion the gui of garageband sucks a lot, and live's gui is excellent for it's easy-to-understand-approach. And garageband does not have something like session view.
come on they can't possibly make a version with less features that still pleases everyone right? the only way to please everyone is to give it more features. it's only logical. you're almost asking them to take features out AND please everyone.
it's not about pleasing everyone. It's about a software that is easy to understand and lets you arrange audiofiles as live 3 did.Johnisfaster wrote:maybe a custom version of live for every customer that buys it. you specify which features you want and then they add it all up on a cash register and ask you to swipe your card?pepezabala wrote:but honestly, Live 6 is the first version that made a little confused.
I could explain live 3 to my mom and she would get it without ever having worked with digital audio.
If I would show live 6 to someone who never worked with live, I believe that only the huge number of different features would confuse you.
I like that all those features exist in the ableton way, but I also already thought that there should be a "beginners edition" or "beginners mode", something like live 3, but with mp3 support, controller-surfaces, freeze and some other stuff that came with the newer versions. But without midi-instruments, racks, sampler and operator.
I think there are lots of people out there that just need to arrange audiofiles. I know people who are working in theatre, dance etc. and ask me for a tool for arranging their music. A "reduced" version of live would be perfect for them.
Now you might say "let them use garageband" - but in my opinion the gui of garageband sucks a lot, and live's gui is excellent for it's easy-to-understand-approach. And garageband does not have something like session view.
come on they can't possibly make a version with less features that still pleases everyone right? the only way to please everyone is to give it more features. it's only logical. you're almost asking them to take features out AND please everyone.
Hey I just had a brainstorm! Live could run like a game like like Quake or something... where once you pass a certain level then you're allowed to proceed to the next level. It would start off as a "Lite" version at a reduced fee, then when you get to the next level it prompts you for your credit card and unlocks some additional features, annd so on.pepezabala wrote:...but I also already thought that there should be a "beginners edition" or "beginners mode", something like live 3, but with mp3 support, controller-surfaces, freeze and some other stuff that came with the newer versions. But without midi-instruments, racks, sampler and operator.
I think there are lots of people out there that just need to arrange audiofiles. I know people who are working in theatre, dance etc. and ask me for a tool for arranging their music. A "reduced" version of live would be perfect for them.
People would be asking for cheats all the time. they already dosimpleton wrote:Hey I just had a brainstorm! Live could run like a game like like Quake or something... where once you pass a certain level then you're allowed to proceed to the next level. It would start off as a "Lite" version at a reduced fee, then when you get to the next level it prompts you for your credit card and unlocks some additional features, annd so on.pepezabala wrote:...but I also already thought that there should be a "beginners edition" or "beginners mode", something like live 3, but with mp3 support, controller-surfaces, freeze and some other stuff that came with the newer versions. But without midi-instruments, racks, sampler and operator.
I think there are lots of people out there that just need to arrange audiofiles. I know people who are working in theatre, dance etc. and ask me for a tool for arranging their music. A "reduced" version of live would be perfect for them.
You would start off with like a version 3 for $99 then pay $99 for each "level" up to ver.6. I'd call it the "pay as you go" instrument. That way people who are not worthy of the advanced features(like me) wouldn't be able to bitch about how hard it is to use and how much money they spent on something they can't comprehend. Of course, the newbies would be restricted to a beginner's forum so they couldn't pollute the advanced forum(this one) with questions like "How comes I don't hear no sound?" Good ideas yes?
or has the userbase become too stupid??hambone1 wrote:Has Live gotten too complex?
Only if you let it. Use as much or as little as you want.