Page 4 of 4
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:33 am
by axou
91.7% here, got 14, 16, 24 and 29 wrong
funny noone got past that score so far
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:50 am
by YILA
jngpng wrote:Anubis wrote:83.3% here also. But unlike most of you I just did it once and didn't cheat(rehearse). I think I did it wrong though because I wasn't just listening for a difference in tone but also trying to spot a difference in pattern(sequence). Nevertheless I feel relieved by my score as I think it represents the perfect balance between musical accuity and creativity.
If you read the entire study, you will learn that a score higher than 90% implies a certain degree of anal retentiveness (or OCD as they call it nowadays) and the afflicted probably spend countless hours fidgetting around creating widgets in Reaktor and also manifest the symptom of very high post counts in many forums around the blogosphere.
What a delightful mix of insecurity and egotism!
wow yeh!.....im sorry mummy made me learn the piano and get over 90%!
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:24 am
by frankie123
jngpng wrote:Anubis wrote:83.3% here also. But unlike most of you I just did it once and didn't cheat(rehearse). I think I did it wrong though because I wasn't just listening for a difference in tone but also trying to spot a difference in pattern(sequence). Nevertheless I feel relieved by my score as I think it represents the perfect balance between musical accuity and creativity.
If you read the entire study, you will learn that a score higher than 90% implies a certain degree of anal retentiveness (or OCD as they call it nowadays) and the afflicted probably spend countless hours fidgetting around creating widgets in Reaktor and also manifest the symptom of very high post counts in many forums around the blogosphere.
What a delightful mix of insecurity and egotism!
yeh, dudes a tool.
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 3:08 am
by rolfski
91,7% don't know what this score really means though
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:26 pm
by sidownes
86.1%
It does seem to be more of a memory test. I would have thought a test for tone deafness would have been to spot differences between single tones?
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:43 pm
by hoffman2k
91,7
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:17 pm
by frankie123
hoffman2k wrote:91,7
LIAR!!!!!!
just kidding.