Page 4 of 6
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:48 pm
by gogmagog
hoffman2k wrote:gogmagog wrote:i still think the presets are shit
and the 'essential thing' is an oxymoron
strings and brass?????? kiss my ?????
You cant beat the Piano though. That one sounds awesome.
granted - but the controls are a bit limited - sostenato especially
yes and before the livers flame me i KNOW that a preset can be a good sonic starting point for a many an 'out there' sound etc etc
oh and that one that is all fifths is quite nice
still....presets....huh
quick! run! its the amen break!!!!
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:51 pm
by noisetonepause
TITBAG wrote:sergeant peppers blah blah
It's called Sergeant Peppers blah blah BAND, you dolt.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:32 pm
by Tone Deft
noisetonepause wrote:TITBAG wrote:sergeant peppers blah blah
It's called Sergeant Peppers blah blah BAND, you dolt.
don't offend dolts, I know some dolts who are very nice people.
and george martin was not into acid.
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:40 am
by forge
Tone Deft wrote:noisetonepause wrote:TITBAG wrote:sergeant peppers blah blah
It's called Sergeant Peppers blah blah BAND, you dolt.
don't offend dolts, I know some dolts who are very nice people.
and george martin was not into acid.
funny - there's a spambot calling itself geoge martin emailing me with the title "Find someone to sleep with tonight bw9"
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:46 am
by nathannn
TITBAG wrote:i'd be quite happy to pay $15,000 for v7 IF they can get the logo right
lets face it a synclavier costs $100,000 if you have a time machine and live in 1983
also the beatles (well george martin actually, no relation to chris martin from coldplay) recorded sergeant peppers blah blah on a four track (i think it was a fostex x15) and serious amounts of lsd
also, statistically, NY gets more rain than seattle
omg too funny!
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:53 pm
by darkenedsoul
If they are talking serious dollars for an upgrade to 7 from whatever version I am passing. I don't care about the video capability put into it because I don't use it/need it atm and don't forsee myself needing it.
bug fixes, midi fixes, etc...for 6 would satisfy me for awhile even though some of these bugs I am not seeing/running into. Then again it all depends on how you are using its resources and what your system can handle for some of them (audio glitches/crackles/etc..). If it was going to cost me ~$200-250 to upgrade maybe. They get into the $300+ range they can forget about an upgrade from me. Not worth it in the long run for return on investment capital...lol
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:17 am
by forge
darkenedsoul wrote:If they are talking serious dollars for an upgrade to 7 from whatever version I am passing. I don't care about the video capability put into it because I don't use it/need it atm and don't forsee myself needing it.
l
since Live 6 I have earned considerably more than the upgrade price making music for videos/animations
just so you know, there are a few of us out here who are really grateful for it
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:23 pm
by darkenedsoul
forge wrote:darkenedsoul wrote:If they are talking serious dollars for an upgrade to 7 from whatever version I am passing. I don't care about the video capability put into it because I don't use it/need it atm and don't forsee myself needing it.
l
since Live 6 I have earned considerably more than the upgrade price making music for videos/animations
just so you know, there are a few of us out here who are really grateful for it
That's all well and good, a lot of us haven't and it's also (perhaps) not our major source of income. I do it for fun and to make a few bucks. I don't bet my career on it. I work in a different industry (high tech/computers) and do music when time permits (between work, band I play in and my own external stuff to do I don't have a ton of time to spend making music atm but hopefully once a project is done I will have more time for that!).
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:45 pm
by Frederik654
nevermind .. me being stupid
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:48 pm
by gaspode
Frederik654 wrote:nevermind .. me being stupid
Wow that was a quick reply change/edit lol!
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:59 pm
by Frederik654
I know
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:11 am
by eyeknow
Frederik654 wrote:I know
no..........EYEknow.............
there will be no live 7 this year
carry on..........or
ON
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:46 am
by monoschall
why the hurry for an upgrade to Live 7?
would be nice if Ableton ironed *all* the bugs out of Live 6 first!
I still occasionally get Live going Whummph! Bang crashing out of sight on OSX
And Live 6 is *still* very sensitive (i.e. can crash it!) while using some NI Reaktor ensembles, which otherwise can load/play fine in Logic Pro!!!
Besides, we're not really at 6.0.7 - some of those version numbers were *only* made to bring the various Live versions in line with each other.
P.S. agree totally, the current Live logo is *really* crap!!
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:18 pm
by moscom_musik
I don't really see why it is so important to some of the people on the forum that Ableton announce Live 7. 6 is already limited for you guys ?
If it is a concern about bug fixes, or some improvements on the GUI, maybe an upgrade to a still hypothetic 6.1 would be enough. As for Live 7, the later it comes, the better it will certainly be...
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:49 pm
by Zerobae
I think it's more that many of us are curious what Ableton cook up next. The Cycling 74 collabo, updates for Live etc.
Even if there's no Live 7 this year I'm pretty sure there will be an announcement soon, as the Abes know people are watching this time of year. At least that's what I hope