Page 4 of 5
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:35 pm
by nebulae
suggestion: record dry as much as possible, so you can post-process later and have options open. If you have to record with FX, don't do much more than compression or EQ.
Also, if you are going to record wet, you'll have to do the following:
Track 1: Input Microphone, Output Track 2.
Track 2: Monitor IN, Record enabled, record Post FX.
Insert whatever effects you want in Track 1. I'd recommend Voxengo's Voxformer or Kjaerhus Golden Audio Channel, as both have lots of options as an all-in-one for vocals (as well as other instruments).
The above setup will enable you to record with the effect. If you recorded on Track 1 only, the recording is totally dry no matter how many FX are inserted.
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:49 pm
by Funkstar De Luxe
PurpleHaze wrote:yeh i am now just wondering, what plugins will i use and how am i going to use them so that the vocals go through them before being recorded.
None. If you need to record WITH compression you need outboard gear. There's no other way of doing it and it's silly to think otherwise.
Right now, plug-ins are no where near the quality of even modest outboard gear. They are considerably cheaper and much more convenient. But I don't know, I would rather have my Manley Variable MU compressor than the equivalent priced VSTs (albeit I could buy maybe 10-15 VSTs for that money). Sadly, high sound quality still costs lots.
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:52 pm
by nebulae
lol...I rest my case...there will always be purists...
I'll disagree slightly and say that it's NOT silly to try.
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:56 pm
by Funkstar De Luxe
nebulae wrote:lol...I rest my case...there will always be purists...
I'll disagree slightly and say that it's NOT silly to try.
Well, it is 100% impossible to record with compression unless using hardware. Logic.
Hardware Signal Flow
MIC - PRE - COMPRESSOR - RECORDING
Software Signal Flow
MIC - PRE - RECORDING - VST EFFECT
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:00 pm
by nebulae
not exactly correct, see my post above:
Mic -> Pre -> Soundcard -> Live Track 1 -> Track 1 Inserts -> Record onto Track 2
So long as you're not saturating your mic pre or your sound card...meaning that your raw signal stays below 0db, you're fine with the above method, which I've used for about 5 years now.
But this doesn't in any way negate your argument that hardware compressors are great.

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:05 pm
by Funkstar De Luxe
nebulae wrote:not exactly correct, see my post above:
Mic -> Pre -> Soundcard -> Live Track 1 -> Track 1 Inserts -> Record onto Track 2
So long as you're not saturating your mic pre or your sound card...meaning that your raw signal stays below 0db, you're fine with the above method, which I've used for about 5 years now.
But this doesn't in any way negate your argument that hardware compressors are great.

You see...
That is recording and then processing. That is NOT recording with compression. What goes into your soundcard IS the recording. What is done after that point is processing.
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:08 pm
by nebulae
bah, minor issue, not too different than what goes on inside a box vs. inside Live.
Look bro, I'm not gonna debate a purist, the bottom line is there is an easy way to do it without needing hardware boxes, and it does work well. That doesn't discount how good it can be with hardware boxes...I have them myself, just prefer to use software for convenience. I can get as good if not better results. So it ain't silly to try.

*hugs*
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:15 pm
by Funkstar De Luxe
nebulae wrote:bah, minor issue, not too different than what goes on inside a box vs. inside Live.
Look bro, I'm not gonna debate a purist, the bottom line is there is an easy way to do it without needing hardware boxes, and it does work well. That doesn't discount how good it can be with hardware boxes...I have them myself, just prefer to use software for convenience. I can get as good if not better results. So it ain't silly to try.

*hugs*
In what way am I a purist? I am only pointing out that your compressor is useless in that chain because it comes after your recording and that it demonstrates terrible signal flow.
The only reason to record anything though a compressor is to prevent clipping. Otherwise why not just compress after you've recorded?
People here would argue back was white. Look; here is your arse, here is your elbow.
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:20 pm
by nebulae
Mic -> Pre -> Soundcard -> Live Track 1 -> Track 1 Inserts -> Record onto Track 2
In this above chain, you don't actually record until the signal goes through the compressor that is an insert in Track 1. You're recording the pos-processed signal onto Track 2. Therefore, the signal IS being recorded AFTER compression.
Also,
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) -
pur·ism /ˈpyʊərɪzəm/
–noun
1. strict observance of or insistence on purity in language, style, etc.
2. neb edit: a strict adherence that hardware compressors are the only way to record and that software is useless
—Related forms
purist, noun
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:29 pm
by nebulae
How about this...why don't you fire up Live and just try my signal flow and tell me what happens. Just for kicks. I'll gladly eat my words if you prove me wrong.
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:42 pm
by pixelbox
What happened to the hug? Let's all hug.
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:44 pm
by nebulae
I'm all about hugs...although I'm still trying to figure out the elbow and arse comment...them scotts are strange lads...
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:44 pm
by PurpleHaze
yeh i would really lkike to hear how good this will sound. It sound great if it really goes good, that means there is money i will save on outboard. Nebulae can i record in any other tracks other than track 2, where the effects will work?
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:47 pm
by sweetjesus
you two are funny...
funkstar, from my understanding people would compress before going to tape to get the maximum sound levels with the least amount of noise floor.
we still try to get as little noise floor as possible these days, but to be honest it doesnt matter as much as it did back then especially since people have realised that hitting digital signals at very hot levels doesnt sound so good.
so yes you're right funkstar, technically you cant do what you are saying but nebulae is saying that it doesnt matter in the context of digital audio.
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:51 pm
by nebulae
PurpleHaze wrote:yeh i would really lkike to hear how good this will sound. It sound great if it really goes good, that means there is money i will save on outboard. Nebulae can i record in any other tracks other than track 2, where the effects will work?
Yeah, you can use this method to record onto any track...that's the beauty of Live's routing. Any track can feed signals to other tracks, and any track can record from any other track, or from the master track, or pre or post fader, or groups of tracks. Now if only Live came with a true hardware compressor, it might be worth a damn.
I kid, I jest...I hug the Scottish.