How to contact the moderator?

Robert Henke · Post by **Robert Henke** » Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:16 am

We don't need a moderator. Our weapons are more precise. it has been known since a while that we monitor this forum and reduce bit resolution and general audio quality in the Live applications of those who post most off-topic stuff when they download their versions...

Rob.

Vance · Post by **Vance** » Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:21 am

Robert Henke wrote:We don't need a moderator. Our weapons are more precise. it has been known since a while that we monitor this forum and reduce bit resolution and general audio quality in the Live applications of those who post most off-topic stuff when they download their versions...

Rob.

Ahhhh... so THAT's why timothyallen and sweetjesus' tracks all sound so dull and lifeless

sweetjesus · Post by **sweetjesus** » Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:29 am

Vance wrote:
Robert Henke wrote:We don't need a moderator. Our weapons are more precise. it has been known since a while that we monitor this forum and reduce bit resolution and general audio quality in the Live applications of those who post most off-topic stuff when they download their versions...

Rob.
Ahhhh... so THAT's why timothyallen and sweetjesus' tracks all sound so dull and lifeless

i love it when u talk dirty.. u are a deadrat!!! ner nerr

Tim, which one of us is gonna go to Canberra to sort things out?

Lo-Fi Massahkah · Post by **Lo-Fi Massahkah** » Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:39 am

Robert Henke wrote:We don't need a moderator. Our weapons are more precise. it has been known since a while that we monitor this forum and reduce bit resolution and general audio quality in the Live applications of those who post most off-topic stuff when they download their versions...

Rob.

Ha!

Vance · Post by **Vance** » Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:19 am

sweetjesus wrote:i love it when u talk dirty.. u are a deadrat!!! ner nerr

Tim, which one of us is gonna go to Canberra to sort things out?

Robert Henke · Post by **Robert Henke** » Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:33 am

posting images reduces maximum track count and raises minimum latency, btw.

thefool · Post by **thefool** » Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:35 am

Robert Henke wrote:posting images reduces maximum track count and raises minimum latency, btw.

THE EASTER BUNNY!!!!!!!
hide

+

I'll COOK it. haha

sweetjesus · Post by **sweetjesus** » Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:43 am

Robert Henke wrote:posting images reduces maximum track count and raises minimum latency, btw.

that would explain his problem here..

http://www.ableton.com/forum/viewtopic. ... 157#601157

and his music in general too

Vance · Post by **Vance** » Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:44 am

Robert Henke wrote:posting images reduces maximum track count and raises minimum latency, btw.

damn, i could have sworn it made the audio engine 15% warmer and 23% more analogue-sounding... maybe i need new speakers...

Vance · Post by **Vance** » Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:46 am

sweetjesus wrote:
Robert Henke wrote:posting images reduces maximum track count and raises minimum latency, btw.

that would explain his problem here..

http://www.ableton.com/forum/viewtopic. ... 157#601157

and his music in general too

hehehehe smartarse

went to the gypsy · Post by **went to the gypsy** » Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:00 pm

Light your pubic hair on fire and the calmly raise your hand and ask to use the bathroom. Works for me every time.

-wttg-

dcease · Post by **dcease** » Sat Mar 22, 2008 3:22 pm

Robert Henke wrote:We don't need a moderator. Our weapons are more precise. it has been known since a while that we monitor this forum and reduce bit resolution and general audio quality in the Live applications of those who post most off-topic stuff when they download their versions...

Rob.

good thing i ain't worried about that shit... i already do that anyway.

Robert Henke wrote:posting images reduces maximum track count and raises minimum latency, btw.

this, however, may be cause for concern...