Page 4 of 4
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:16 am
by Robert Henke
We don't need a moderator. Our weapons are more precise. it has been known since a while that we monitor this forum and reduce bit resolution and general audio quality in the Live applications of those who post most off-topic stuff when they download their versions...
Rob.
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:21 am
by Vance
Robert Henke wrote:We don't need a moderator. Our weapons are more precise. it has been known since a while that we monitor this forum and reduce bit resolution and general audio quality in the Live applications of those who post most off-topic stuff when they download their versions...
Rob.
Ahhhh... so THAT's why timothyallen and sweetjesus' tracks all sound so dull and lifeless
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:29 am
by sweetjesus
Vance wrote:Robert Henke wrote:We don't need a moderator. Our weapons are more precise. it has been known since a while that we monitor this forum and reduce bit resolution and general audio quality in the Live applications of those who post most off-topic stuff when they download their versions...
Rob.
Ahhhh... so THAT's why timothyallen and sweetjesus' tracks all sound so dull and lifeless
i love it when u talk dirty.. u are a deadrat!!! ner nerr
Tim, which one of us is gonna go to Canberra to sort things out?
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:39 am
by Lo-Fi Massahkah
Robert Henke wrote:We don't need a moderator. Our weapons are more precise. it has been known since a while that we monitor this forum and reduce bit resolution and general audio quality in the Live applications of those who post most off-topic stuff when they download their versions...
Rob.
Ha!
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:19 am
by Vance
sweetjesus wrote:i love it when u talk dirty.. u are a deadrat!!! ner nerr
Tim, which one of us is gonna go to Canberra to sort things out?
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:33 am
by Robert Henke
posting images reduces maximum track count and raises minimum latency, btw.
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:35 am
by thefool
Robert Henke wrote:posting images reduces maximum track count and raises minimum latency, btw.
THE EASTER BUNNY!!!!!!!
hide
+
I'll COOK it. haha
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:43 am
by sweetjesus
Robert Henke wrote:posting images reduces maximum track count and raises minimum latency, btw.
that would explain his problem here..
http://www.ableton.com/forum/viewtopic. ... 157#601157
and his music in general too
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:44 am
by Vance
Robert Henke wrote:posting images reduces maximum track count and raises minimum latency, btw.
damn, i could have sworn it made the audio engine 15% warmer and 23% more analogue-sounding... maybe i need new speakers...
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:46 am
by Vance
hehehehe smartarse
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:00 pm
by went to the gypsy
Light your pubic hair on fire and the calmly raise your hand and ask to use the bathroom. Works for me every time.
-wttg-
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 3:22 pm
by dcease
Robert Henke wrote:We don't need a moderator. Our weapons are more precise. it has been known since a while that we monitor this forum and reduce bit resolution and general audio quality in the Live applications of those who post most off-topic stuff when they download their versions...
Rob.
good thing i ain't worried about that shit... i already do that anyway.
Robert Henke wrote:posting images reduces maximum track count and raises minimum latency, btw.
this, however, may be cause for concern...
