Re: Climate Change & Einstein's - You cannot solve a problem ...
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:22 am
I didn't say this, beats me implied this and I gave him shit for it.Funk N. Furter wrote:Cocksparrow - black people breed to much?
I didn't say this, beats me implied this and I gave him shit for it.Funk N. Furter wrote:Cocksparrow - black people breed to much?
are you an alien?Funk N. Furter wrote: Forge - ask the government and big business nicely, even though they are aliens who want to kill us all?
.
Funk N. Furter wrote: How about people summarise their positions? It's been a long thread. And it ain't over 'til the nutritionally challenged female person sings.
And Funken I would like to wholeheartedly thank you for clearly not having read a single word of anything I have ever said and feeling compelled to summarize it for me.Funk N. Furter wrote: Forge - ask the government and big business nicely, even though they are aliens who want to kill us all?
.

Funken, this is pretty much exactly what I've been arguing for in every political post I've ever written.Funk N. Furter wrote: Funken - the mass of the population should run the show for the benefit of humanity. This should be done by a democratic government which will take energy, transport etc into public ownership. Stop all arms production. Retool weapons factories to produce green energy. Produce for need not profit.
.
Here: viewtopic.php?f=40&t=194939&start=615Funk N. Furter wrote:where? And if so, why are you banging on about fertility rates for black people?
Beats wrote:The key is to stop having kids. You’d have no personal reason to give a damn about the longevity of the planet while at the same time ironically cutting back on the need for planet destroying resources. Two rights make a right.
Jack McOck wrote:The key is for blacks, Indians and the Chinese to stop having kids. Or do you really object to Switzerland's 1.5 fertility rate, which being below a sustainable level of at least 2.1 would ultimately lead to the extinction of the Swiss?
To be clear, are you saying that there are too many blacks, or that you wish to see the Swiss people wiped out?
You raciss'
A term I neither brought up, nor mention? I think not.Funk N. Furter wrote:define overpopulation
Not for me to decide. From the start of this little outrage you guys have got going on, you've misinterpreted everything I've said. I believe you even called me raciss' at point, which is a very harsh accusation.Funk N. Furter wrote:Even if that is true it does not prove cause and effect. Therefore the correlation means what?
"The origin of the name Niger, which originally applied only to the middle reaches of the river, is uncertain. The likeliest possibility is an alteration, by influence of Latin niger "black", of the Tuareg name egerew n-igerewen" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niger_River)Funk N. Furter wrote:So what does Egerew n-Igerewen mean then?
QFTFunk N. Furter wrote:Kids are perfectly capable of learning subjects like science and politics in their teens. There is no need to change the language. Kids can learn what the words mean very easily. They often grasp things quicker than adults.Forge. wrote:Funken, this is pretty much exactly what I've been arguing for in every political post I've ever written.Funk N. Furter wrote: Funken - the mass of the population should run the show for the benefit of humanity. This should be done by a democratic government which will take energy, transport etc into public ownership. Stop all arms production. Retool weapons factories to produce green energy. Produce for need not profit.
.
I guess you're not getting your message through, grandad! If you want the KIDS to get into it then you need to tell it in language they'll underSTAND!
I'm just happy to know you're getting some, even if it is only from your crippled hands.Funk N. Furter wrote:Are you happy if I toss, McOck?Jack McOck wrote:
Any other odd queries you'd like to toss my way?
Wow, you caught me there. I guess I'll have to post this link now, damn you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_overpopulationFunk N. Furter wrote:Jack McOck wrote:A term I neither brought up, nor mention? I think not.Funk N. Furter wrote:define overpopulation
Jack McOck wrote: The aptly named Niger has a fertility rate over 7. As for the India and China, do you wish to argue that overpopulation is not a problem there?
Jack McOck wrote: Wow, you caught me there. I guess I'll have to post this link now, damn you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_overpopulation
You do realise that what I posted was in response to a comment by beats me, and purposely stayed within the confines of his logic, in order to expose the flaws therein? At no point did I ever claim that the earth was overpopulated, which was why I was reluctant to go down this path.Forge. wrote:Jack McOck wrote: Wow, you caught me there. I guess I'll have to post this link now, damn you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_overpopulation
Malthus: A whiny cunt from the 18th century who reckoned we'd all be dead by now.
you mean like the difference between camembert or stilton?Jack McOck wrote: Again, subtlety and nuance is lost on this crowd.