Re: screw dual booting.
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:01 pm
yah i was on page 3 when i repliedrobin wrote:See above
ha ha
yah i was on page 3 when i repliedrobin wrote:See above
heh hehgomi wrote:
yah i was on page 3 when i replied
ha ha
That's what I was planning on doing until a friend decided to pretty much give me his dual 2.5 G5 for next to nothing.MrYellow wrote:Rebooting all the time just to use a program..... Used to have to do that
for a few things where I had specially tweaked hardware profiles but got
more CPU now...... I think you'd probably find it better to just run 2
computers with KVM, a cheap PC for a few progs wouldn't set you back
much at all.
-Ben
RopeyPunter wrote:what does that mean in english ?
It means he read Ars Technica's article on Intel's Core architecture and couldn't make enough sense of it to actually nick something that would make sense in this context...RopeyPunter wrote:what does that mean in english ?
an application that is a "universal binary" means that it can run on both PPC and intel-based MacIntosh hardware running OSX 10.3.9 or higher. at this point in the space-time continuum, it bears no relevance towards Windows OS, AFAIK.forge wrote:I'm really interested about this - what exactly does "universal binary" mean? it kind of suggests that you can run either or - are we moving towards a setup where you can just run any components of either OS all at the same time - not even bother loading the OSX or Windows shell and just load live plus the plug-ins you want weather they are mac or PC - so if the PC version of live runs better then run it and eventually there will only be "universal binary" and no mac or PC versionsnowtires wrote:now what they need to do is, when they get the quad core mactels, figure out a way to boot up both osx and xp at the same time, each using one dual processor a piece. you could run everything you wanted in osx and have the xp running gigasampler or fruity loops! oh man, i haven't used fruity loops in years.
does anyone know how likely that is?
neener neeener neeenernoisetonepause wrote:It means he read Ars Technica's article on Intel's Core architecture and couldn't make enough sense of it to actually nick something that would make sense in this context...RopeyPunter wrote:what does that mean in english ?
You do know that if this was college you'd be kicked out for thisgomi wrote:neener neeener neeenernoisetonepause wrote:It means he read Ars Technica's article on Intel's Core architecture and couldn't make enough sense of it to actually nick something that would make sense in this context...RopeyPunter wrote:what does that mean in english ?
If this was college, you would be too drunk to be botherednoisetonepause wrote:You do know that if this was college you'd be kicked out for thisgomi wrote:neener neeener neeenernoisetonepause wrote: It means he read Ars Technica's article on Intel's Core architecture and couldn't make enough sense of it to actually nick something that would make sense in this context...
college is for sissies.noisetonepause wrote: You do know that if this was college you'd be kicked out for this
can you elaborate?sweetjesus wrote:virtualization
in 2 years nothing will be the same
Well, my member title on the SOS forum is Blouse Wearing Nancy...gomi wrote:college is for sissies.noisetonepause wrote: You do know that if this was college you'd be kicked out for this