Page 5 of 5

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:07 am
by lis102trants
So this Jamie Lidell guy.. is his act simular to Kid Beyond's? I can't really tell from the short youtube clips but a lot of his stuff sounds like looped vocals

Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:43 pm
by RedBrooklyn
lame

Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 2:59 pm
by gomi
franknputer wrote:That was pretty cool, but I wasn't blown away. He never seemed to get a cohesive thing going - some of the beats were cool, but he never built on any of them...and the effects stuff...it was kinda interesting for about a minute, but reminded me of the shit I used to do with a guitar & a digital delay...

also his timing is horrid.

Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:30 pm
by dancerchris
I'm with the sales dude, it was a lot like walking into the keyboard area of Guitar Center.

Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:08 pm
by snowtires
Tone Deft wrote:
kabuki wrote:
Johnisfaster wrote: yeah you're right. there is absolutely not skill in improvisation......

like jazz ya know? terrible music cause it's just all random and stuff.

(taste the sarcasm please)
I get that there is improvisation. I improvises with my ass every time I farts. Doesn't mean it's any more enjoyable. Smell the sarcasm, please.

Jazz has chords, melody, a key... and a structure of SOME kind. That's not even a stretch for me to find one. I can't, for the life of me, find squat resembling a musical structure or a tune in it. (I have heard some ultra-fast Drum and Bass that some might consider IDM, but it was just really fast DnB.)

If they called it "Improvizational Noise Music" instead of "INTELLIGENT Dance Music", I would at least get where they are going with it. I see neither intellegence nor danceability in it. They could call it Texas Two-Step and it would be about as fitting as IDM. :?

Just my opinion.
'They' don't like the term IDM for the same reasons.
Jazz is not always about the chart, 'learn all your theory, shut up and play.' I went to a jazz performance where they played from the plot of an atom being smashed, each performer picked a particle and followed its path outward.

Like you said, it's opinion, I hear where you're coming from, there can be a fine line between noise and music. I err on the side of having no line.
yeah, but jazz bands can typical string the pieces of a song together, without it feeling like part... new part... new part..., etc. this kid is good, but he doesn't have much skill in making a cohesive piece of music. instead of a song, it's just a bunch of parts put next to each other. kind of.

Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:11 pm
by snowtires
lis102trants wrote:So this Jamie Lidell guy.. is his act simular to Kid Beyond's? I can't really tell from the short youtube clips but a lot of his stuff sounds like looped vocals
i think his live stuff is like that, sometimes, but the albums are completely different. i was a fan of his after the second album, i honestly think his first album blows, it's just hard to listen to. the second album has a very motown-ish bluesy vibe, with most of the programming being masked so you don't think there's programming at all. i think he toured with a band for a little, but i'm not sure what he's doing now.