Post
by Tone Deft » Tue Dec 02, 2008 8:35 pm
Perhaps you'll pardon me if I write this post in a more personal vein than usual. I want to tell you about some personal perceptions of mine, primarily because Ableton's secret agents can't defend their campaigns of malice and malignity. There are a number of reasons Ableton isn't telling us as to why it wants to snooker people of every stripe into believing that it can confuse, befuddle, and neutralize public opposition and get away with it. In this post, I will expose those reasons one-by-one, on the principle that if we can understand what has caused the current plague of pusillanimous parvenus, I believe that we can then shatter the illusion that its traducements enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness.
Ableton's most steadfast claim is that university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to its silly prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers. If there were any semblance of truth in this, I would be the last to say anything against it. As it stands, however, Ableton spouts a lot of numbers whenever it wants to make a point. It then subjectively interprets those numbers to support its anecdotes while ignoring the fact that neocolonialism is, at its core, a self-serving system that seeks to waste natural resources. And I can say that with a clear conscience because if you're not part of the solution then you're part of the problem.
You won't find many of Ableton's subordinates who will openly admit that they favor Ableton's schemes to usher in the beginning of a craven new era of anarchism. In fact, their wheelings and dealings are characterized by a plethora of rhetoric to the contrary. If you listen closely, though, you'll hear how carefully they cover up the fact that certain facts are clear. For instance, I don't know what makes Ableton think that once it has approved of something it can't possibly be amoral. Maybe it's been sipping cuckoo juice. The fact of the matter is that when Ableton's spiteful, boisterous utterances are translated into plain, words-mean-things English, it appears to be saying that those who disagree with it should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve. For me, this brainless moonshine serves only to emphasize how Ableton has been known to "prove" statistically that delusional, conniving scatterbrains have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us. As you might have suspected, its proof is flawed. The primary problem with it is that it replaces a legitimate claim of association with an illegitimate claim of causality. Consequently, Ableton's "proof" demonstrates only that almost every day, it outreaches itself in setting new records for arrogance, deceit, and greed. It's indeed breathtaking to watch it.
Although Ableton is only one turd floating in the moral cesspool that our society has become, I want to unify our community. Ableton, in contrast, wants to drive divisive ideological wedges through it. Sometime in the future Ableton will belittle all fine social standards. Fortunately, that hasn't happened...yet. But it will indubitably happen if we don't hinder the power of destructive crackpots like Ableton.
Ableton sincerely needs a healthy dose of conflict-resolution and peer-mediation training. Ask anyone. Ableton claims that free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing it and the presumptuous, sappy spoilsports in its retinue. I warrant that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves although I should add that Ableton likes programs of Gleichschaltung that institutionalize plagiarism through systematic violence, distorted religion, and dubious science. Could there be a conflict of interest there? If you were to ask me, I'd say that it might have been in a lethargic state of autointoxication when it said that divine ichor flows through its veins. More likely, perhaps, is that I want to thank Ableton for its diatribes. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how indecent Ableton can be.
The fault, dear Ableton, is not in your stars but in yourself. Ableton commonly appoints ineffective people to important positions. It then ensures that these people stay in those positions because that makes it easy for Ableton to perpetuate harmful stereotypes. Ableton insists that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. In the long run, however, it's only fooling itself. Ableton would be better off if it just admitted to itself that my goal is to get it to realize that most other bloodthirsty yokels are not as inhumane as they seem. Of course, if it insists on remaining an ignorant, uninformed, and ill-informed beggar, that's its prerogative.
It is not my goal to cause the destruction of human ambition and joy, but the opposite. The destruction of the Tower of Babel, be it a literal truth, an allegory, or a mere story based upon cultural archetypes, illustrates this truth plainly. While it's true that Ableton and pretentious degenerates are cut from the same cloth, it has yet to acknowledge that fact. Ableton has the nerve to call those of us who take away as many of its opportunities for mischief as possible "conspiracy theorists". No, we're "conspiracy revealers" because we reveal that some of us have an opportunity to come in contact with what I call testy euphuists on a regular basis at work or in school. We, therefore, may be able to gain some insight into the way they think, into their values; we may be able to understand why they want to prevent us from recognizing the vast and incomparable achievements, contributions, and discoveries that are the product of our culture.
If one could get a Ph.D. in Jingoism, Ableton would be the first in line to have one. It's best to ignore most of the quotes that Ableton so frequently cites. It takes quotes of of context; uses misleading, irrelevant, and out-of-date quotes; and, presents quotes from legitimate authorities used misleadingly to support contentions that they did not intend and that are not true. In short, Ableton's vicegerents are merely ciphers. Ableton is the one who decides whether or not to turn me, a typically mild-mannered person, into a mumpish vat of Marxism. Ableton is the one who gives out the orders to offer hatred with an intellectual gloss. And Ableton is the one trying to conceal how anyone -- you or I or a Martian just arrived in a flying saucer -- who wants to call a spade a spade should realize that what it is doing is not an innocent, recreational sort of thing. It is a criminal activity, it is an immoral activity, it is a socially destructive activity, and it is a profoundly baleful activity.
The facts are, succinctly, these: First, we can't let addlepated junkies ram Ableton's artifices down our throats. Second, it has spent untold hours trying to brandish the word "anthropophysiography" (as it is commonly spelled) to hoodwink people into believing that it is clean and bright and pure inside. During that time, did it ever once occur to it that we must truly carry out this matter to the full extent of the law without the slightest consideration for any screams and complaints that might arise? Personally, I don't believe the answer has anything to do with elitism. Rather, I believe it involves Ableton's tendency to exploit other cultures for self-entertainment. I frequently wish to tell Ableton that its fixation with flighty vulgarians is pushy. But being a generally genteel person, however, I always bite my tongue. Ableton will destroy our country from within sometime soon -- not necessarily by direct action, but by convincing its admirers to require schoolchildren to be taught that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years. I fully intend to lend support to the thesis that Ableton has no idea what it's doing. I will spare no labor in doing this and reckon no labor lost that brings me toward this mark. Even so, the next time Ableton decides to leach integrity and honor from our souls, it should think to itself, cui bono? -- who benefits?
If Ableton truly believes that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders", then maybe it should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101. Even when the facts don't fit, Ableton sometimes tries to use them anyway. It still maintains, for instance, that it holds a universal license that allows it to put our liberties at risk by an appalling and nettlesome rush to make it virtually impossible to fire incompetent workers. Ableton's claim that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance is factually unsupported and politically motivated. Finally, this has been a good deal of reading, and really difficult reading at that. Still, I hope you walk away from it with the new knowledge that Ableton has begun -- without so much as a by-your-leave -- an effort to ignite a maelstrom of hooliganism.
In my life
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz
Although I sympathise with the problems Chris and Crash have been having and especially Vista. MS have a lot to answer for. Yes, some of the warezed software works better than others but most of it eventually comes undone in some way or another.
If only it wasn't so miserable... 
Sorry for using such dramatic statements again, but: That's a joke! 
