Re: District 9
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:50 pm
saw trailer at cinema last night. Looks GOOD. 2 weeks til UK release
I wonder why that is.sidownes wrote:saw trailer at cinema last night. Looks GOOD. 2 weeks til UK release
Yeah it wasn't deep, but the thing is it's easy to write off a movie like that if you're not big on the military, or the archetypes the military around the world espouses to give itself a sense of honor and glory. Henry V was a much better example of this for sure. I like the edit of that movie though, the plot was throw away, but the edit was as well paced as Robocop, which is what IMO an action type movie should be like. Think Hard Boiled, and all other action movies pale in comparison.DrXparaMental wrote: I agree 100% except I wouldn't be as generous about Starship Troopers which IMO was basically "Friends" or 90210 in space.
It did work well for that movie though. My only gripe with that movie was I had no real care for the main girl, her being in danger had no punch because IMO she was an annoying loudmouth.The absolute worst trend in surreal tension movies is the novelty approach. Like for instance what the Blair Witch project started with the movie being seen through the cam corder.
Meet the Feebles was brilliant! I saw it when it came out in the theatre; how can you go wrong with junkie hooker muppets?Although it will be no LOTR, Jackson doesn't make "bad" movies. There is always something there to like even though Meet The Feebles was definitely pushing it.
Machinesworking wrote:Yeah it wasn't deep, but the thing is it's easy to write off a movie like that if you're not big on the military, or the archetypes the military around the world espouses to give itself a sense of honor and glory. Henry V was a much better example of this for sure. I like the edit of that movie though, the plot was throw away, but the edit was as well paced as Robocop, which is what IMO an action type movie should be like. Think Hard Boiled, and all other action movies pale in comparison.DrXparaMental wrote: I agree 100% except I wouldn't be as generous about Starship Troopers which IMO was basically "Friends" or 90210 in space.![]()
Maybe, or it's a send up of the finer elements of fascism. It's not the end of the world to look at the 'glory' of that world view. 300 was definitely a fascist ideal for instance. Movies can and do explore the elements of right wing thinking in various genres, but it comes up most in action flicks.Android Bishop wrote:Machinesworking wrote:Yeah it wasn't deep, but the thing is it's easy to write off a movie like that if you're not big on the military, or the archetypes the military around the world espouses to give itself a sense of honor and glory. Henry V was a much better example of this for sure. I like the edit of that movie though, the plot was throw away, but the edit was as well paced as Robocop, which is what IMO an action type movie should be like. Think Hard Boiled, and all other action movies pale in comparison.DrXparaMental wrote: I agree 100% except I wouldn't be as generous about Starship Troopers which IMO was basically "Friends" or 90210 in space.![]()
I'm pretty sure starship troopers is supposed to be a satire of all that shit to begin with. Its a commentary on fascism.
Yep, we're right there together on this one. Jackson is beyond BRILLIANT. I am still blown away by the fact that he did LOTR. Not so much because they were such incredible world class films, because he assuredly has that kind of talent, but rather out of my sheer praise for a unique signature director/film maker that brought us stuff so different in the context of Dead Alive and Bad Taste.Machinesworking wrote: Meet the Feebles was brilliant! I saw it when it came out in the theatre; how can you go wrong with junkie hooker muppets?I love his early work, pretty much all of it, Dead Alive and Heavenly Creatures especially. It's crazy to see him make it big, give you a little hope that there's one or two people at these movie companies that aren't total morons.
Really...that or it's fairly bright of you to take it like that. Interesting, I guess I just didn't "see" the intentional darkness within the film to inspire that type of allegorical cross section. Nonetheless, I appreciate the insight.Android Bishop wrote:Machinesworking wrote:Yeah it wasn't deep, but the thing is it's easy to write off a movie like that if you're not big on the military, or the archetypes the military around the world espouses to give itself a sense of honor and glory. Henry V was a much better example of this for sure. I like the edit of that movie though, the plot was throw away, but the edit was as well paced as Robocop, which is what IMO an action type movie should be like. Think Hard Boiled, and all other action movies pale in comparison.DrXparaMental wrote: I agree 100% except I wouldn't be as generous about Starship Troopers which IMO was basically "Friends" or 90210 in space.![]()
I'm pretty sure starship troopers is supposed to be a satire of all that shit to begin with. Its a commentary on fascism.
Cronenburg makes cool films. He's a special case. Dead Ringers was at least as good if not better than the book, but Crash was a disaster compared. I'm not surprised though, not because he's not a good director, but because the book relies heavily on inner dialog and the writers style to get the point across far too well. Just don't tell me you think Tim Burton is a genius, and if you can admit he just has great taste in set design but can't direct worth a shit, then we're on the same page pretty much movie wise.DrXparaMental wrote: Another amazing director that runs in some ways very parallel to Jackson is Cronenberg. His films are some of the most bizarre, powerful and compelling ever made, but he can do a much less surreal "straight" film amazingly well too.
When it comes to films, I just watch them to escape. I'm really not that in touch with the exact details and such, so I'll admit there is a big bunch of ignorance there. For instance, now that I think about it I remember seeing in the previews for District 9 that Jackson was "producing" it. If the poster before your response hadn't reminded me, I would have thought he was directing it. BTW, I didn't think Kong was that bad at all. What's even worse, I didn't know Jackson directed it!Machinesworking wrote:Cronenburg makes cool films. He's a special case. Dead Ringers was at least as good if not better than the book, but Crash was a disaster compared. I'm not surprised though, not because he's not a good director, but because the book relies heavily on inner dialog and the writers style to get the point across far too well. Just don't tell me you think Tim Burton is a genius, and if you can admit he just has great taste in set design but can't direct worth a shit, then we're on the same page pretty much movie wise.DrXparaMental wrote: Another amazing director that runs in some ways very parallel to Jackson is Cronenberg. His films are some of the most bizarre, powerful and compelling ever made, but he can do a much less surreal "straight" film amazingly well too.
Watch it again with that in mind. it makes a lot more sense from that perspective. The whole citizenship thing, military culture, propaganda laden news stories, etc. Also, you'll notice that humans are actually the villains in the movie.DrXparaMental wrote:Really...that or it's fairly bright of you to take it like that. Interesting, I guess I just didn't "see" the intentional darkness within the film to inspire that type of allegorical cross section. Nonetheless, I appreciate the insight.Android Bishop wrote:
I'm pretty sure starship troopers is supposed to be a satire of all that shit to begin with. Its a commentary on fascism.
Knotkranky & Android BishopAndroid Bishop wrote:Watch it again with that in mind. it makes a lot more sense from that perspective. The whole citizenship thing, military culture, propaganda laden news stories, etc. Also, you'll notice that humans are actually the villains in the movie.DrXparaMental wrote:Really...that or it's fairly bright of you to take it like that. Interesting, I guess I just didn't "see" the intentional darkness within the film to inspire that type of allegorical cross section. Nonetheless, I appreciate the insight.Android Bishop wrote:
I'm pretty sure starship troopers is supposed to be a satire of all that shit to begin with. Its a commentary on fascism.