hps909 wrote:
each to their own if you prefer digging around finding problems finding fixes and work arounds trying to resolve conflicts the sure windows is the greatest...
interestingly, none of these is needed on any of my systesms
[sarcasm]the registry in windows is the greatest invention ever to hit the personal computer[/sarcasm]
another myth. the registry as it was known and bad doesn't exist since years. it's virtualized to still be accessible like in old days. and why? because apps need it.
..anti spyware/malware , anti virus who wants to deal with that shit???? not me
well, me neighter, and interestingly, you don't need to. nowadays windows are very secure by default
..if you just wanna get down to work and write some music with a relatively transparent OS then yes mac os shits on windows .....
i don't care if it shits. i care that it works. use nice words please. and believe me, my systems work 15 minutes after plugging in the usb stick to install my os. after those 15 minutes i could go on stage with them, rocking ableton live 8 in any version without crashes. worked so far, on more than one system.
hardly a tiny world..you do realize there are 3rd part dev's for os X don't you? When i moved form windows to OS X i installed windows on bootcamp (something your PC's cant do legally) it lasted all of a month because you know what? there was nothing i could do in windows that i couldn't do in os x..
the macworld is tiny compared to the windows world. 1/20th of the user base. and most software IS windows. i don't say it's non-existant or something. i just say it's comparable tiny. well, i have tons of things i couldn't do in osx. or i don't care to find solutions to do the same i did before (why should i relearn everything??)
not really i paid $1800 AUD for my imac now a comparable brand name (which is what mac is a brand name) computer spec for spec including a 22" LED LCD, wireless keyboard mouse and silent case came in at around the same cost you could probably build a PC from yumcha parts for maybe $200 less but you never really know if it will work untill you actually turn the thing on and you can load windows or linux on it .. then you have a nervous couple of weeks waiting to see if everything will work flawlessly with it .. there are NO GUARANTEE'S are there?
i can get business grade quadcores with lot of ram for around 700$, with guarantees, tested drivers and configs, etc.
i can get 12" laptops.
i can get blueray support.
i can get so much, and i still pay less. i don't have to chose from the list of 3 different laptop types in some configs, the all-in-one pc or the mac pro, or the macmini. tons of options, tons of them much cheaper than any mac option at all.
i have both and TBH i get more shit done with less issues in OS X.. core audio and expose' alone are worth the asking price
well, what does core audio do? allows you to hear audio in your speakers? amazingly, all my windows boxes can do this just fine. expose is nice, but not needed for live per se (as it's one window only). and i can get it for windows just as well, for free actually. so no, it's not worth the money
but i know, one that loves mac can't even think straight. i know enough of them. they show me amazing things, i just note how often that funny colour wheel turns, or how often they just accept to wait for something to load.
and how they accept to press the power button to reset it once it's frozen again.
they're no magic. they're a tiny, closed environment. and that's why they work quite well. if they would have the market share of microsofts windows, they would be dead by now. that's why they like to stay small, closed, and so restrictive. it's the only way to not have to show how they would else fail.
and they're fine for music, right? so why did the last service pack (which you had to pay for) made so many ableton live installations suddenly instable? browse the forum if you don't believe it.