Re: GANGNAM STYLE
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 11:49 pm
^ the scary part is... all the copy cats that this "craze" will spawn... will not be doing a parody.
The fact it is often written by Koreans, in the Korean language, and performed by Koreans makes it K-pop. And from what I've seen beyond Gangnam Style, there is much of what is distinctly Korean in their popular culture beneath the familiar sounds and sights to those us in the west. They are creators and innovators as much as anyone else is. The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Elvis etc all borrowed heavily from other artists. Pop music, as well as rock, is from black folks. A group of people who were treated like crap by the west until sometime around 1970. And I daresay the "pop world" is now global, and not "western".simmerdown wrote:where is the 'new' part...seems to be western pop, overdubbed, and regurgitated back to us...if it were a representation of actual K-culture, i daresay the pop world would want nothing to do with it...a new culture/style of music.
even the female stereotypes, the materialist bs...thats stolen/borrowed, not new...cliche' to the max yo
of course! anything less would be unacceptable! S-Pop has a dress code.humnumb wrote:Should Scottish bands all be playing bagpipes and wearing kilts when they perform?
simmerdown wrote:
if psy, or even all of k-pop, make a lasting impact, like Led Zep or the Beatles i will eat my f**cking hat, right before i shoot myself
But I have to agree that from my sampling of K-pop, other than language there's absolutely nothing that makes it uniquely Korean. Not complaining about that, but I don't think they can claim most of it as their own.humnumb wrote:The fact it is often written by Koreans, in the Korean language, and performed by Koreans makes it K-pop. And from what I've seen beyond Gangnam Style, there is much of what is distinctly Korean in their popular culture beneath the familiar sounds and sights to those us in the west. They are creators and innovators as much as anyone else is. The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Elvis etc all borrowed heavily from other artists. Pop music, as well as rock, is from black folks. A group of people who were treated like crap by the west until sometime around 1970. And I daresay the "pop world" is now global, and not "western".simmerdown wrote:where is the 'new' part...seems to be western pop, overdubbed, and regurgitated back to us...if it were a representation of actual K-culture, i daresay the pop world would want nothing to do with it...a new culture/style of music.
even the female stereotypes, the materialist bs...thats stolen/borrowed, not new...cliche' to the max yo
Should Scottish bands all be playing bagpipes and wearing kilts when they perform?
...or unique at all...if there is, then what?...other than language there's absolutely nothing that makes it uniquely Korean


volx757 wrote:I think you know that music has evolved outside the Western world.
Yes you missed what's going on outside the Western world in music. Not that that's something to blame you for, but don't assume that just because you haven't heard it, it doesn't exist.