The only justification I can think of that holds any water when it comes to using cracks is people wanting to learn - the entire DTP/3D industry would've ground to a halt before now if it wasn't for kids learning Adobe/Bryce etc. The difficulty comes when that 'learning' starts to seam into actually 'using' - because as your list ably demonstrates, once you have the knowledge and barring one essential - Live or the DAW of your choice - you don't need to use a single crack. Period.
But do we see the 'music media' actively promoting this? No - because they're too busy promoting the latest thing - the 'must have' - that 'sound' etc. They are the ones most publicly attacking the warez scene - and they're the ones that should be publicising the alternative! Every review, where possible, should introduce a comparable piece of freeware so that instead of downloading the latest Sonalksis EQ the kids are checking out Posifophit.
Just like other devoted users of Live I want to see the company grow and the product develop because it is a world beater. Whilst every other DAW was heading down the route of increased complexity and production values the Abe's hit the nail on the head with an app that actually assisted you in creating music. And let's face it they've got the ideal copy protection - the crackers won't crack it. Do you think that the likes of H20 et al can devote the resources to reverse engineer a Syncrosoft dongle but can't crack Live after christ only knows how many shots at it?