Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:28 pm
+3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592307816406286208998628034825342117067982148086513282306647093844...
Ableton Forum
Please Please Please - More than 1 automation line + fades
Page 6 of 7
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 8:34 am
yup...
+1
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 10:56 am
+1
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:50 pm
+1
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 8:57 pm
+1
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:36 am
It seems to me that The "DJ" focus of LIVE sometimes blinds them to some of the normal and essential features of other DAW's.
I agree on this, workflow is halted in the sequencer view, and although Live 6 did refine some of the recording features they still need to refine the sequencer view (which is where I do all my work).
Maybe Live should make 2 different interfaces one for gig (live) playing and one for recording.
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:45 pm
+1! yes we need this!!! and recording of automation into session view clips too!
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:50 pm
+3926742752
Plussing here as well. I really REALLY want to see this feature, as my songs are becoming much much more complex these days. Come on Abes, make it so!
Plussing here as well. I really REALLY want to see this feature, as my songs are becoming much much more complex these days. Come on Abes, make it so!
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 12:21 pm
now heres a good idea indeed.bigcohoona wrote: Maybe Live should make 2 different interfaces one for gig (live) playing and one for recording.
it is called Ableton Live, so focussing on the ability to use it live should be the main priority.
if they want to create the perfect DAW, so be it, then make it separate from the live part then, because id rather see them spend their resources on perfecting it for live useage, as it is what its intended for, as stated by the name.
theres tons of ideas and requests on the forums here which is mainly for liveuseage, and that is what they should focus on, rather then trying to make yet another sequencer.
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 6:59 am
bump
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:31 pm
like a said in my recent thread while over looking this one.
to expand on unfolding tracks in the arrangement view, if you could have multiple lanes below the midi editor in the clip view to (optionally) replace the usually redundant (in my case) velocity lane then programming complex drum patterns using control of multiple parameters simultaneously would become easier ten fold, because at present it becomes a laborious laboured task that usually ends in compromise due to frustration from constantly clicking between the env and midi view and then going on to faff with the two drop down menus to find your parameter. this becomes laughable when you are doing tiny adjustments of say, pitch env amount and and pitch env decay etc.
a similar set up below the wave editor in the clip view would also be as useful
id like to take this chance to note that i did notice the addition in 6 of viewing only automated parameters in a single drop down menu which increased productivity in this respect by a small margin but its still not enough.
to expand on unfolding tracks in the arrangement view, if you could have multiple lanes below the midi editor in the clip view to (optionally) replace the usually redundant (in my case) velocity lane then programming complex drum patterns using control of multiple parameters simultaneously would become easier ten fold, because at present it becomes a laborious laboured task that usually ends in compromise due to frustration from constantly clicking between the env and midi view and then going on to faff with the two drop down menus to find your parameter. this becomes laughable when you are doing tiny adjustments of say, pitch env amount and and pitch env decay etc.
a similar set up below the wave editor in the clip view would also be as useful
id like to take this chance to note that i did notice the addition in 6 of viewing only automated parameters in a single drop down menu which increased productivity in this respect by a small margin but its still not enough.
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:31 pm
bumpa chump
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 10:45 am
yeah this is an essential future upgrade 
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:31 pm
+1
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 3:32 pm
However, live is a sequencer. Just a different type of sequencer. The flexiblity of writing and jamming in session view is just as much a part of Live as the performance aspect. I'm guessing most people playing their own matial on stage use live to write it in the first place. So adding features to help in the writing and editing of their music ultimately improves the performance.friend_kami wrote:now heres a good idea indeed.bigcohoona wrote: Maybe Live should make 2 different interfaces one for gig (live) playing and one for recording.
it is called Ableton Live, so focussing on the ability to use it live should be the main priority.
if they want to create the perfect DAW, so be it, then make it separate from the live part then, because id rather see them spend their resources on perfecting it for live useage, as it is what its intended for, as stated by the name.
theres tons of ideas and requests on the forums here which is mainly for liveuseage, and that is what they should focus on, rather then trying to make yet another sequencer.
I don't think adding these features makes live like logic or cubase, as the session view is unique to live. It's about giving people the tools they need to help them within this environment. As long as it can be done without cluttering up the GUI.