CUBASE / ABLETON AGAIN
-
- Posts: 4721
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 12:45 am
- Location: New Jersey
Lets just re-iterate how much of a TW£T this geeza is...
http://www.ableton.com/forum/viewtopic. ... 2&start=15
fool
http://www.ableton.com/forum/viewtopic. ... 2&start=15
fool
-
- Posts: 6659
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:56 am
- Location: greater toronto area
First of all it's SAMPLITUDE and yet again, same pan law, same audio files, same plugins, no difference. Live, Cubase and Samplitude all use the same 32 bit summing architecture.
Samplitude has a good reputation for audio as it was truly an audio editor on first release (the first one to run in 32 bit floating point mixing too) that has subsequently had MIDI and vst support etc added, whereas Cubase and Sonar started out as MIDI programs which added audio.
Samplitude also has a great set of plugins available in the box, probably the best compressors, EQs and reverbs etc. on a Windows platform (yes, Sonar has good plugins too since they got 3rd party like Kjaerhus and Sonitus on board and Cubase 4 has vastly improved synths and plugins compared to SX3).
Which DAW are you going to suggest next - How about SAWSTUDIO BLOWS LIVE AWAY? I'm enjoying the comedy element of this thread, it's good to laugh
Samplitude has a good reputation for audio as it was truly an audio editor on first release (the first one to run in 32 bit floating point mixing too) that has subsequently had MIDI and vst support etc added, whereas Cubase and Sonar started out as MIDI programs which added audio.
Samplitude also has a great set of plugins available in the box, probably the best compressors, EQs and reverbs etc. on a Windows platform (yes, Sonar has good plugins too since they got 3rd party like Kjaerhus and Sonitus on board and Cubase 4 has vastly improved synths and plugins compared to SX3).
Which DAW are you going to suggest next - How about SAWSTUDIO BLOWS LIVE AWAY? I'm enjoying the comedy element of this thread, it's good to laugh
http://soundcloud.com/umbriel-rising http://www.myspace.com/leedsquietmandemos Live 7.0.18 SUITE, Cubase 5.5.2], Soundforge 9, Dell XPS M1530, 2.2 Ghz C2D, 4GB, Vista Ult SP2, legit plugins a plenty, Alesis IO14.
yes, there have been many equivalence phase tests.blaugruen7 wrote:are there any AB tests of playback of the same stereo files in both clients?
i think lives panlaw is set to 0. so do this the same to cubase.
i really believe that live is percieved to sound different because it looks different and feels different.
taking a set number of tracks into both, say 10 audio files. Then rendering as a mix and taking the cubase and the live file and inverting one and laying it over the other. IE Phase reversal & cancellation.
If both files are the same then the files should cancel. Can you guess what happened?
clue: there was no phatness or yellow-whiteness left over.
after the tests all the people who could hear a magic difference, claimed that something else must be the elf like reason. Such claims as - "I don't care what the 'science' says, my ears tell me different, I am a pro, etc".
Which gave rise to the great "ears better than science" hilarity of 2007.
Whatever you want to believe is true, then that is true for you.
Last edited by Angstrom on Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 3:05 am
-
- Posts: 4721
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 12:45 am
- Location: New Jersey
Who would have thought this thread reveals some interessting information, thanks for posting that. I always wondered how come Samplitude has such high regard amongst these creationists of digital audio.leedsquietman wrote:Samplitude has a good reputation for audio as it was truly an audio editor on first release (the first one to run in 32 bit floating point mixing too) that has subsequently had MIDI and vst support etc added, whereas Cubase and Sonar started out as MIDI programs which added audio.