Ableton Forum

This isn't helping me with saving $9.99 haha.

So, what's this about the ability to load in your own wavetables? Does the multi-track recorder have an overdub? Is the multi-track capable of just putzing around uninterrupted as almost a performance tool?

Edit: too late

No idea, no idea, and no idea, I never use those features

Yeah. Coming from Live, I try to exploit features beyond the ones generally expected. I was able to make a small loop, it wasn't toooo small. But what is kind of neat is that if I do record bits and pieces within the four track time slot, it lets me move those around very very quickly. I can even for instance loop a quarter note, and it be a weird sweep. And gradually move the sweep more and more towards the open end as it loops that quarter note. And doing this while playing pads or whatever.

That's just a weird random example. But yeah, there is a lot for me to explore

Alchemy has something similar, and that's my go to synth most of the time. Shame that more people check out the recorders, some of these are pretty well done.

So there is a class action lawsuit against Apple for previously deleting songs off iPods that were bought through a competitor to iTunes. All sounded plausible until Apple’s lawyers proved it was doubtful the 2 main plaintiffs even owned an iPod at the time.


Out of the millions of people who have owned an iPod since their release they had to pick 2 people who didn’t.



More weight added to the fact that a good amount of Apple haters don’t even have experience with Apple products.

beats me wrote:So there is a class action lawsuit against Apple for previously deleting songs off iPods that were bought through a competitor to iTunes. All sounded plausible until Apple’s lawyers proved it was doubtful the 2 main plaintiffs even owned an iPod at the time.

Out of the millions of people who have owned an iPod since their release they had to pick 2 people who didn’t.

More weight added to the fact that a good amount of Apple haters don’t even have experience with Apple products.

They did actually own ipods, but one was bought in 2006 and the others were bought by the woman's husbands firm. So not technically bought by her.

Regardless, Apple do admit to deleting songs, but are trying to get this particular class action case dismissed.
http://www.macworld.com/article/2855595 ... g-you.html

Apple didn’t deny the claim raised by attorney Patrick Coughlin in U.S. District Court Wednesday. Security director Augustin Ferrugia said Apple would remove songs to prevent users from syncing malicious files to their computers,

Its hilarious that Apple has now fully turned into the Big Brother character from their old adverts.
But I understand that some prisoners grow to love their jailers

In some fairness back in the Napster and Limewire days there were a lot of bad files flying all over the place. That is a valid point Apple could use to at least cover their ass.

ipod? I pod?

Meh, I'm just using this an excuse to bump shit up to get rid of "you know who"

Angstrom wrote: Its hilarious that Apple has now fully turned into the Big Brother character from their old adverts.
But I understand that some prisoners grow to love their jailers

How dare you.

Remember when the iPods were shipped with a firewire cable?

That was awesome.

Exactly Bro

LoopStationZebra wrote:Remember when the iPods were shipped with a firewire cable?

That was awesome.

I remember the first one I got (hand-me-down) sat around for like a year collecting dust because I didn’t quite get the point.

BEATS =

Its hilarious that Apple has now fully turned into the Big Brother character from their old adverts.
But I understand that some prisoners grow to love their jailers

Funny you say that because I was thinking the same thing when I read about the IBM venture this morning.
If Jobs wasn't busy screaming at god for how pathetically designed his coffin was he'd only be spinning in it.