
Puppy
Two more words, skanky hoH20nly wrote:Two words: Paris Hilton
Two more words: Purse puppy
Oh, that's just in other countries.shadx312 wrote:to paraphrase Chinese expression 'you just wanna eat him up'
Lol, you don't have a very good observational sense then do youMachinesworking wrote:I don't own and probably never will own a small dog, but I don't think there's any, zero in fact, connection between small dog owners and a type of person. It's actually that sort of logic that's so inherently wrong with this sort of thing. Think the idea all the way through and you can't possibly conclude that a type of pet is inherent to a type of personality. If you don't think it through, you come to conclusions based on anecdotal evidence and selection bias, and the world devolves a little more.aisling wrote: I am not a small dog person (under 30 lbs), and I don't connect with many small dog owners, and I attempt to be a rather friendly and outgoing person most of the time, and always when in my professional work persona, however, Jack Russell Terriers are notably cool, smart, and cute.
I think I know what is happening here: You are so invested (as you should be) in maintaining that race in humans is not a predictive category, that you have the need to extend that to dogs as well.Machinesworking wrote:This is a great example of what I'm talking about. A dog park in CA, USA, in a specific neighborhood, in a specific culture, is indicative of a type of person universally.aisling wrote: In theory you are 100% correct! in practice, I invite you you to small dog hour at our dog park, and see if you can still maintain that view. I had it initially, and maybe it is the stereotype backlash I get having a Shepard, but it is an understood phenomenon at our dog park, that the small dog owners are not as welcoming, or as relaxed, and have more instances of conflict, than the rest. It should not be that way based on sane conventional logic, but it just seems to unfold that way.
One of the most friendly outgoing happy girls I know has one of the smallest, most angry dogs I've met.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selection_bias
Your conclusions are essentially what's wrong with people these days, their "observational sense" takes precedent over evidence.TomViolenz wrote: Lol, you don't have a very good observational sense then do you![]()
(And yes, I'm with Shadx, the small dogs (and their owners) I am referring to fit into a purse and are what I classify as ankle biters.
It is common knowledge btw. that these small dogs have behavioral disorders akin to a perpetualy overcompensated low self esteem. That usually goes for their owners as well.
I'll just leave this here, because you're so invested in your conclusion, you quoted evidence contradicting it, and continued to keep at it.TomViolenz wrote:BTW: You are pointing to selection bias, which is apt but not in the way you think it is. The dog owners select the kind of dog they want. So different sort of people select different sorts of dogs, making the dog they own a good representation of the type of person they are.Machinesworking wrote:
One of the most friendly outgoing happy girls I know has one of the smallest, most angry dogs I've met.