So, if we can opt out of Spotify and all streaming. What is seen as the true benefit of that? In real terms, not simply 'Spotify are decimating the industry', that's a personal stance and I respect it. What end result are people hoping to gain? Strictly more money?
There's so much music out there that we usually get one shot, to get a listener to decide we are worth more of their time. Seconds even.
Surely unless you are in their pocket, on their gizmo, on their preferred format to meet and greet us and our wares, accessible at any moment, we're doing ourselves an injustice? Or am I just dense?
Is the idea that not being on Spotify will encourage/force me come to the artist's preferred way of delivering the product and accept that as the only way to listen? I need to know that I like it enough to bother first. Where do I engage with the music then? The radio? Too random.
I get the decision if it's for non financial reasons. Vinyl only... whatever.
I have done that and missed out on a bunch of digital revenue in the process.

Sure, it's all underground and what not, but in this thread we're talking about financial survival no? Would also selling digital have lowered the vinyl sales... the stats resulted in no.
But that's hindsight and I lost out. If I can avoid that in the future then great. It's why I'm pissing myself off typing/sharing this even...
Don't we need (only in the case of maximising financial returns) to be on everyone's preferred music format? What's the perceived/real benefit from blanking streaming services?