wish : Elastique Pro algorithm

timothyallan · Post by **timothyallan** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:08 am

oh good one!!

forge · Post by **forge** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:48 am

well, as feature requests go, this is one of the most bumped I'd say

Abe has a pretty good record on going for the most popular requests

sparklepuff · Post by **sparklepuff** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:20 am

forge wrote:well, as feature requests go, this is one of the most bumped I'd say

Abe has a pretty good record on going for the most popular requests

128 Parameters

I still +500 out of this thread. Even though it's 50% behind the above.

forge · Post by **forge** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:41 am

sparklepuff wrote:
forge wrote:well, as feature requests go, this is one of the most bumped I'd say

Abe has a pretty good record on going for the most popular requests
128 Parameters

I still +500 out of this thread. Even though it's 50% behind the above.

I said ONE OF

I hope automation in session has got as many

Patch · Post by **Patch** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:05 am

GIVE ME PRO! ...before I godda come down there, blow up your car.

Coupe70 · Post by **Coupe70** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:58 am

+1

any word from ableton on this ?

Angstrom · Post by **Angstrom** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:11 pm

they won't comment on it .. it's not their way.
But they will have noticed the interest in the thread.

Just like everyone else - they avoid proper work by reading the forums too!

hi Amo!

Amaury · Post by **Amaury** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:18 pm

Angstrom wrote:they won't comment on it .. it's not their way.
But they will have noticed the interest in the thread.

Just like everyone else - they avoid proper work by reading the forums too!

hi Amo!

Hi

It's part of my job, you know.. How would we know what users wish for, otherwise??

best,
Amaury

chrisedmo · Post by **chrisedmo** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:33 pm

I've just seen this:

Experience the amazing quality of our élastique time stretching and pitch shifting engines in (listed alphabetically):

ableton Live 5, 6, 7 (élastique efficient)
acoustica MixCraft 2.5, 3 (élastique efficient)
ALCATech BPMStudio 5 (élastique efficient)
ALCATech DigiScratch 2 (élastique efficient)
Bias Inc. Peak 5.x (élastique efficient)
Cockos Reaper 2.x (élastique Pro)
HighAndes Trakax 1 and higher (élastique SOLOIST & efficient)
Image-Line FLStudio 5, 6 (élastique efficient)
Image-Line FLStudio 7 (élastique Pro)
Mackie Tracktion 3 (élastique efficient)
M-Audio Torq 1.5 (élastique efficient)
Native Instruments Kontakt 1.5, 2 (élastique SOLOIST V1)
Native Instruments Intakt (élastique SOLOIST V1)
Native Instruments Traktor 2, 3 (élastique efficient V1)
SampleBase.com Satellite (élastique SOLOIST)
Steinberg Cubase 4 (élastique SOLOIST)
überschall Elastik loop player (élastique Pro)
xtsoftware energyXT 2 (élastique efficient)
zero-x BeatQuantizer (PolyStretcher) 1 (élastique efficient)

so how come FL gets the pro version ? Come on this need to be updated - can't fall behind FL!!!

Eve n keeping the efficient versions as an option ?

Coupe70 · Post by **Coupe70** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:39 pm

even REAPER is PRO.
so it can´t be that expensive....

Angstrom · Post by **Angstrom** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:51 pm

Amaury wrote:
Angstrom wrote:they won't comment on it .. it's not their way.
But they will have noticed the interest in the thread.

Just like everyone else - they avoid proper work by reading the forums too!

hi Amo!
Hi

It's part of my job, you know.. How would we know what users wish for, otherwise??

best,
Amaury

heh, I know of course.

I just thought I'd use my magic pixie revealing dust

dazzer · Post by **dazzer** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 4:04 pm

+1 for great justice

sweetjesus · Post by **sweetjesus** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:02 pm