Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:12 am
They sound wayyyy phatter dynamically than software.
that's so wrong, let's just not start.lola wrote:They sound wayyyy phatter dynamically than software.
I know, don't want to start a discussion between hard and soft, but... yea.....Tone Deft wrote:that's so wrong, let's just not start.lola wrote:They sound wayyyy phatter dynamically than software.
/sigh... goddamnit...lola wrote:I know, don't want to start a discussion between hard and soft, but... yea.....Tone Deft wrote:that's so wrong, let's just not start.lola wrote:They sound wayyyy phatter dynamically than software.
people must find out for themselves i think.
Well fine. But I don't seriously take 5ms of latency into account when considering the disadvantages of computers.Tone Deft wrote:not with ZERO latency.glitchrock-buddha wrote:
Not to take away from the MPCs coolness, but that can all be done just as easy or easier with something like an akai MPD32 or padkontrol and Live.
YMMV.glitchrock-buddha wrote:Well fine. But I don't seriously take 5ms of latency into account when considering the disadvantages of computers.Tone Deft wrote:not with ZERO latency.glitchrock-buddha wrote:
Not to take away from the MPCs coolness, but that can all be done just as easy or easier with something like an akai MPD32 or padkontrol and Live.
condra wrote:For every person that posts a reply here about how cool MPCs are, there's ten others who don't give a shit about MPCs.