Page 1 of 8
Thoughts on Max for Live
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:42 am
by timothyallan
first.
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:52 am
by Homebelly
step sequencers..
midi LFO's..
NRPN.
Assignable CC's..
OSC, for those that need it...
I'm assuming it is going to be MAX with out the MSP/Jitter...
I would also guess it will be a new product attached to live.
So a live expanded if ya know what i mean.

I would not be at all surprised if we see a Live 7.? with the max part as a paid for add on in the same way as sampler/operator.
Personally that would work out just peachy for me.
Re: Thoughts on Max for Live
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:54 am
by mkelly
Gonna have to confess that I'll need to read up a bit more on Max, but it looked like something I (as a software engineer) would be interested in. A modified version for Live is probably going to be enough to get me interested.
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:56 am
by Machinate
well know a helluva lot more in what, 10 hours?
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:59 am
by Meef Chaloin
I hope its easier than Max, that looks a headfuck
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:02 am
by Machinate
Meef Chaloin wrote:I hope its easier than Max, that looks a headfuck
Operative word "looks". srsly, max is EASY, and it has like a gazillion tutorials that take you up from the ultra simple "this is a button" stage to hardcore coding.
I can't wait to get stuck in, personally.
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:04 am
by logic_user99
It looks v. eenteresting TBH. If it means I can get out of Reaktor, and start to utilise more of the 'Reaktor-like' features in Live directly, I'll be 'on it' so to speak...
I'm more interested in the APC40 right now, though!
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:12 am
by tjwett
Ableton has the UI thing nailed down cold. Max is very powerful, but fucking UGLY. yeah, crucify me. i know it's cool and i've see people do amazing things with it but it looks gross and is not fun to use, definitely not musical feeling at all. if these two teams of talent can take that power and make it musical, easy on the eyes and intuitive enough to use then i think it can open a whole lot of doors. looking forward to finding out.
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:12 am
by aeon
y'all work with computers... what looks so terrifying about Max?
skinned percussion resonance modes are scary. analogue filter emulations in DSP are scary.
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:18 am
by tjwett
aeon wrote:y'all work with computers... what looks so terrifying about Max?
skinned percussion resonance modes are scary. analogue filter emulations in DSP are scary.
not terrifying. just not musical. takes a lot of patching before you have a musically useful device laid out before you. removes you from the right brain state where musical ideas and creativity come from and puts you too far to the left where you're suddenly "working at a computer" for hours on end. if they can make it fast and easy (easy enough, anyway) to create interesting things without leaving Live and music-making mindset then it's a winner.
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:18 am
by emma
tjwett wrote:Ableton has the UI thing nailed down cold. Max is very powerful, but fucking UGLY. yeah, crucify me. i know it's cool and i've see people do amazing things with it but it looks gross and is not fun to use, definitely not musical feeling at all. if these two teams of talent can take that power and make it musical, easy on the eyes and intuitive enough to use then i think it can open a whole lot of doors. looking forward to finding out.
exactly , it should be well integrated into the Live gui - looks like all the other Live instr. , the original Max gui is terrible , really (from a musicians point of view) ...

Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:23 am
by crumhorn
Does this mean we'll be able to drop an instance of operator, sampler, saturator or whatever into a Max patch?
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:26 am
by Machinate
emma wrote:the original Max gui is terrible , really (from a musicians point of view) ...

I really don't feel that way - I can understand why people might object to v.4.* which is really old, but v5 makes fantastic little GUIs.
not terrifying. just not musical. takes a lot of patching before you have a musically useful device laid out before you.
It takes two to three minutes to build a viable step sequencer in Max.
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:27 am
by tjwett
crumhorn wrote:Does this mean we'll be able to drop an instance of operator, sampler, saturator or whatever into a Max patch?
i think the other way around actually. i'm guessing Max-ish tools for creating native Ableton devices.
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:30 am
by Meef Chaloin
i hope it enables live to have folder tracks, a bit like the way Drum Racks work. That would be sexy