Page 1 of 2
Windows 7
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:12 pm
by morerecords
What of it?
Re: Windows 7
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:20 pm
by hijo de la pula
Great!
Re: Windows 7
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:15 pm
by leedsquietman
we'll know for sure about a month after it's been released and widely in use by the general public

Re: Windows 7
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 2:13 pm
by morerecords
hmmm could be very exciting!
Re: Windows 7
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 2:57 pm
by chris vine
Well I hope it isn't the same ultra bloat as Vista..........
Re: Windows 7
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:08 pm
by nebulae
Every report suggests this is gonna be the next XP and it's gonna kick ass.
My issue is that I'm hoping everything runs well on the 64bit version, because the 3-4gb ram limit is getting old.
Re: Windows 7
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:26 pm
by juanpablo1313
Yes, it runs better the 64 bit version than the x86, so no worries

just sit and wait the software developers to make the change.
And, it's very stable IMHO, I've using it with Live 7 and no problems. Like 1 and a half week now and no errors or any problems. Good. An it's just a BETA. (build 7057 here)
Re: Windows 7
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:35 pm
by 3dot...
used it for a month... I really liked the interface...but it wasn't vibing with the RME drivers...so back to XP...
Re: Windows 7
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:14 am
by loquat
juanpablo1313 wrote:And, it's very stable IMHO, I've using it with Live 7 and no problems. Like 1 and a half week now and no errors or any problems. Good. An it's just a BETA. (build 7057 here)
How does Live perform in Windows 7 compared to XP? Any major changes is CPU usage or latency?
Re: Windows 7
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:45 am
by Zygi
yeaaaaaaaaaaah win 7...... hmmmm......
worked fine until something started freezing my laptop at startup. went back into vista.
Re: Windows 7
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:45 pm
by Imaulle
I've been running build 7057 for almost two weeks now. it's rock solid
Re: Windows 7
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:48 pm
by mlekodukye
was running great on build 7000, cpu usage was exactly as in XP, but now, having it updated to 7057, the graphics went slow and jerky, meters lag, vst controls lag... i tried different video drivers, native ATI and the one from M$ [ati radeon HD2400 xt] with equal lack of success.. also the overall feeling of the system is kind of degraded if compared to build 7000. i'm afraid that the RTM version will be ballasted down even more to be a descent sucksessor to Vista...
Re: Windows 7
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:02 pm
by Imaulle
you need to be on 7.0.14 or later and you need to run Live in compatability mode for Vista
Re: Windows 7
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 2:33 pm
by mlekodukye
Imaulle, man, but does that mean that we need to upgrade Abe everytime the OS build is updated?))
today, that 'windows 7' driver v.9.3 from ati started giving me BSODs!
in fact, i resolved the issue by rolling back the ati native driver to a previous version. [which is, funny enogh, is not targeted for win7, only for Vista]. now the graphics are as smooth as it was before.
Re: Windows 7
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:04 pm
by sweetjesus
mlekodukye wrote:Imaulle, man, but does that mean that we need to upgrade Abe everytime the OS build is updated?))
today, that 'windows 7' driver v.9.3 from ati started giving me BSODs!
in fact, i resolved the issue by rolling back the ati native driver to a previous version. [which is, funny enogh, is not targeted for win7, only for Vista]. now the graphics are as smooth as it was before.
you should report this to microsoft.