Page 1 of 2
High CPU utilisation...
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2004 4:22 pm
by Caz
It must be that more Live 4.01 have the same issue... really high CPU util with just 3 or 4 softsynths loaded and a couple of basic (Ableton) effects on some Audio tracks and you hit 100%.... and this on a dual-processor 1.25Mhz G4 (Mac OS X 10.3.5) with more than 1 Gig of RAM.... setting the latency on my m-audio 2496 doesn't help much, even if you put the latency to 25ms or so....
Any tips....? Or do we just have to live with it....?
Thanks! Btw Live 4 is great!
high cpu
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 7:59 am
by carllarkos
Hello
Mines the same and i am running windows xp with 3g prossesor and 1g ram.Live 3 was ok but not 4
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:47 am
by cpu
well, i can verify this, L4 needs more power than L3. But this only shown in the taskmanager, not in the Live CPU-Meter. But the most "wonder" is, even if the TM shows 100% i can drag some plugs anymore

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 5:40 pm
by guatamaham
ditto. it's the same on my 1.33Ghz Pbook w/1.25GB of RAM. I can load a few soft synths and effects and that's about it. the Ableton reverb alone sucks up about 10-15% CPU (depending on its configuration)! that seems much worse than 3, I could load a lot of effects in 3 before it choked.
hoho
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 6:58 pm
by Spacerboy
i use live on a p2-266MHz and i have no problems at all
Re: hoho
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 7:22 pm
by EnjoyRC
Spacerboy wrote:i use live on a p2-266MHz and i have no problems at all
Just like the performance I get on my Intel 286 w/8MB ram? Oh, some of you are too young to remember 286's and 386's.
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 7:36 pm
by hoffman2k
yeah. maybe it's an illusion but i believe the beta's consumed less.
Keep in mind that you can save alot of cpu by turning off filters, lfo's and such you do not use anyway.
Re: hoho
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 4:47 am
by guatamaham
Spacerboy wrote:i use live on a p2-266MHz and i have no problems at all
you must have a magic machine, then. the Live 4 specs claim it won't even run on that machine (will windows 98 even run on that machine?), let alone without problems.
winME
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 8:46 am
by Spacerboy
i use a modified winME version. runs really well...
Re: winME
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 8:22 pm
by guatamaham
Spacerboy wrote:i use a modified winME version. runs really well...
weird. but it's good to hear that it's working out for someone. FWIW, I just ran some tests and on my machine (1.33Ghz Pbook) Live will run at most 4 instances of Reaktor while Tracktion (an audio/MIDI sequencer costing only $80) can easily run 6 with room to spare for some VST effects. so obviously Live 4 is not as efficient as it could be.
Re: hoho
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 9:17 pm
by mike holiday
EnjoyRC wrote:Spacerboy wrote:i use live on a p2-266MHz and i have no problems at all
Just like the performance I get on my Intel 286 w/8MB ram? Oh, some of you are too young to remember 286's and 386's.
what about the 8088's?
and TAG BBS's?
man
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 2:08 pm
by sniffio
Yap it goes pretty much to 100%.
With great random audio drop outs.
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 3:20 pm
by Nub
I think it'saccepted that there is a CPU issue with Live 4.x, be it with the Live CPU meter or the actual CPU consumption, the fact that there is a difference between the two, or the fact that it's just too plain high compared to 3.x for an unknown but vocal number of users!
Can I suggest emailing Ableton direct with this problem and providing useful data to them on platform etc, I did and they are working on it.
Hopefully we will have a solution soon.
nub
h
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:36 pm
by sniffio
thx.
plz check out about the random audio dropouts in OSX.
Watch out for that !
Re: hoho
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 7:30 pm
by mike holiday
[/quote]
Just like the performance I get on my Intel 286 w/8MB ram? Oh, some of you are too young to remember 286's and 386's.[/quote]
i remember my 8088