Tips for using Yamaha 01X with Live4 as a Remote surface ?
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 4:59 pm
Hi forum posse,
I've started integrating a Yamaha 01X into my setup and have very much been enjoying Mackie Control style integration with SX3/Nuendo3 .
Mackie Control mode unfortunately doesn't appear to be relevant to Live.
Correct me if I'm wrong however it would appear the Yamaha 01X only allows creation of 1 single Generic remote control. Is this true? Unfortunately the 01X manual is a little cryptic !
To date I've configured my BCF2000 superbly with Live4. Basically my scheme is that each Channel/Track in Ableton is allocated a MIDI CC type equal to the track number. I then use different MIDI channels for each family of BCF fader/encoder/button. The first scene location memory (out of the BCF2000's 32 memories) I use to control Ableton Live tracks 1 through 8, Scene 2 controls tracks 9 through 16, etc, etc.
This scheme I've worked out above for BCF2000 works well with Live for 2 reasons ....
#1
Its extendable and potentially accomodates up to 128 Channels of Ableton Live (since there are 128 MIDI CC types available).
#2
Although Ableton doesn't support a Fader Bank style function (the very thing which makes Mackie Control work with things like Cubase SX) switching quickly between scene presets on the BCF2000 provides a perfectly workable solution.
I tried using the default mapping setup in the Yamaha 01X's Generic controller mode. As a test I assigned the static set of 9 faders to 8 Live Channels and the 9th to the Master fader. Pitch bend messages are used for the main faders in the 01X's default Generic controller mapping.
After assigning these Ableton was properly sending out update data to the motors promptly snapping all the faders to 0 position. Then things started getting very weird .... Moving faders with the mouse would make the motorised faders on the 01X start to twitch errartically. Upon releasing mouse the fader would continue twitching and then randomly jump to a different position (???). Faders adjacent to the adjusted fader would also start twitching out .... mmmmmmmmmmm ....
There's nothing erratic about the faders on the 01X since operating the 01X under Cubase SX3.0.1.514's Yamaha 01X driver delivers smooth reliable fader updates with no hint of twitching or MIDI issues. In fact now I understand why people rave about having Mackie Control integration with scribble strips when a DAW allows deep integration with Mackie Control.
Can anyone share useful experiences in setting up the Yamaha 01X with Live 4 as a control surface ????
Can anyone offer any advice ?
Dear Ableton's .... Full Mackie Control integration (with scribble strip parameter name feedback) would certainly be a welcome addition to a future update/upgrade at some stage when the development process allows the time.
Thanks for taking the time to read this post.
Incidentally the 01X is a damn fine piece of kit. Great, solid build quality. Smooth fader operation, M-Lan audio interfacing. Please don't get the impression from the above coments I'm dissatisfied with this machine because it is quality in my humble opinion ....
Cheers !
jasefos
I've started integrating a Yamaha 01X into my setup and have very much been enjoying Mackie Control style integration with SX3/Nuendo3 .
Mackie Control mode unfortunately doesn't appear to be relevant to Live.
Correct me if I'm wrong however it would appear the Yamaha 01X only allows creation of 1 single Generic remote control. Is this true? Unfortunately the 01X manual is a little cryptic !
To date I've configured my BCF2000 superbly with Live4. Basically my scheme is that each Channel/Track in Ableton is allocated a MIDI CC type equal to the track number. I then use different MIDI channels for each family of BCF fader/encoder/button. The first scene location memory (out of the BCF2000's 32 memories) I use to control Ableton Live tracks 1 through 8, Scene 2 controls tracks 9 through 16, etc, etc.
This scheme I've worked out above for BCF2000 works well with Live for 2 reasons ....
#1
Its extendable and potentially accomodates up to 128 Channels of Ableton Live (since there are 128 MIDI CC types available).
#2
Although Ableton doesn't support a Fader Bank style function (the very thing which makes Mackie Control work with things like Cubase SX) switching quickly between scene presets on the BCF2000 provides a perfectly workable solution.
I tried using the default mapping setup in the Yamaha 01X's Generic controller mode. As a test I assigned the static set of 9 faders to 8 Live Channels and the 9th to the Master fader. Pitch bend messages are used for the main faders in the 01X's default Generic controller mapping.
After assigning these Ableton was properly sending out update data to the motors promptly snapping all the faders to 0 position. Then things started getting very weird .... Moving faders with the mouse would make the motorised faders on the 01X start to twitch errartically. Upon releasing mouse the fader would continue twitching and then randomly jump to a different position (???). Faders adjacent to the adjusted fader would also start twitching out .... mmmmmmmmmmm ....
There's nothing erratic about the faders on the 01X since operating the 01X under Cubase SX3.0.1.514's Yamaha 01X driver delivers smooth reliable fader updates with no hint of twitching or MIDI issues. In fact now I understand why people rave about having Mackie Control integration with scribble strips when a DAW allows deep integration with Mackie Control.
Can anyone share useful experiences in setting up the Yamaha 01X with Live 4 as a control surface ????
Can anyone offer any advice ?
Dear Ableton's .... Full Mackie Control integration (with scribble strip parameter name feedback) would certainly be a welcome addition to a future update/upgrade at some stage when the development process allows the time.
Thanks for taking the time to read this post.
Incidentally the 01X is a damn fine piece of kit. Great, solid build quality. Smooth fader operation, M-Lan audio interfacing. Please don't get the impression from the above coments I'm dissatisfied with this machine because it is quality in my humble opinion ....
Cheers !
jasefos