Ableton Forum

H20nly wrote:yeah all of Pink Floyd's albums sucked before they got 64 bit. you can totally tell when Daft Punk got it too.

I think Pink Floyd have never gone 64 bit. All their records suck.
Well the old 8bit ones have some kind of interesting texture.

If they ever do a 64 bit version of Live 8 I'll eat my hat. In fact I'm so confident there won't be one I'd buy a whole hat shop and eat that. There's no way they'd put that much massive amount of work into making a 64 bit L8 when we effectively never paid for a 64 bit version and all their effort will be going into a new version, not a version of software that's so old it's actually older than my friends son Harry, who already has intelligent conversation, his own favourite bands, and can play guitar (albeit not that well)! They'll save that for Live 9.

So back to the other old chestnut...

WHERE'S LIVE 9!!!!
WHERE'S LIVE 9!!!!
WHERE'S LIVE 9!!!!
I WANT IT NOW!!!
NOWWWWWWWWW!

As you were....

Maybe gehard should just post that live 9 is in production. There's still a reasonable bit of work to do on it, and it'll be 64 bit. That would make people calm down while basically telling them nothing at all!

Simon12345 wrote:

H20nly wrote:yeah all of Pink Floyd's albums sucked before they got 64 bit. you can totally tell when Daft Punk got it too.

I think Pink Floyd have never gone 64 bit. All their records suck.
Well the old 8bit ones have some kind of interesting texture.

Pink Floyd were infinite bit as it was all analogue. That's why their laptop never goes down and ruins the show.

H20nly wrote:yeah all of Pink Floyd's albums sucked before they got 64 bit. you can totally tell when Daft Punk got it too.

So you are basically telling us that you've got at your home all the instruments, synths, outboard gear, that they had during the recording of their albums, and you can record them and play them directly instead of sampling them ? impressive!

^ no. i basically said:

H20nly wrote:yeah all of Pink Floyd's albums sucked before they got 64 bit. you can totally tell when Daft Punk got it too.

And then I said:

Simon12345 wrote:

H20nly wrote:yeah all of Pink Floyd's albums sucked before they got 64 bit. you can totally tell when Daft Punk got it too.

I think Pink Floyd have never gone 64 bit. All their records suck.
Well the old 8bit ones have some kind of interesting texture.

to which Piplodocus replied:

Piplodocus wrote:

Simon12345 wrote:

H20nly wrote:yeah all of Pink Floyd's albums sucked before they got 64 bit. you can totally tell when Daft Punk got it too.

I think Pink Floyd have never gone 64 bit. All their records suck.
Well the old 8bit ones have some kind of interesting texture.

Pink Floyd were infinite bit as it was all analogue. That's why their laptop never goes down and ruins the show.

and then came dr. doom 007 talking about big studios and tons of unaffordable gear.
sounded a bit off topic in my humble opinion.

yeah, i'm not sure what that crap has to do with 64 bit.

64 BIT

H20nly wrote:yeah, i'm not sure what that crap has to do with 64 bit.

64 BIT

I wonder if ableton will release an 8 bit version in the near future...
my big projects drive me nuts, I need more restrictions.

H20nly wrote:^ no. i basically said:

H20nly wrote:yeah all of Pink Floyd's albums sucked before they got 64 bit. you can totally tell when Daft Punk got it too.

Well I think it is still very on-topic =) (also we dodged a recursive loop which could have crashed this forum by a few).
You seem to mean that ranting about no 64 bit is pointless because others have done well without 64 bit.

What I wanted to say is that they had actually FAR LESS restrictions, in time, gear, musical instruments, than most of us solo home-studists with a 49 key keyboard and a m-audio soundcard. And 32 bit is another one of these restrictions...

And 8-bit music is pretty cool, but if you want to make an orchestral arrangement of the composition / recording of a progressive metal band with 7 guitars 3 drumkits 2 basses and 45 synths , you don't go the atari st way...

doom_Oo7 wrote:

H20nly wrote:^ no. i basically said:

H20nly wrote:yeah all of Pink Floyd's albums sucked before they got 64 bit. you can totally tell when Daft Punk got it too.

Well I think it is still very on-topic =) (also we dodged a recursive loop which could have crashed this forum by a few).
You seem to mean that ranting about no 64 bit is pointless because others have done well without 64 bit.

What I wanted to say is that they had actually FAR LESS restrictions, in time, gear, musical instruments, than most of us solo home-studists with a 49 key keyboard and a m-audio soundcard. And 32 bit is another one of these restrictions...

And 8-bit music is pretty cool, but if you want to make an orchestral arrangement of the composition / recording of a progressive metal band with 7 guitars 3 drumkits 2 basses and 45 synths , you don't go the atari st way...

you don't seem to be very funny, but you also are right on that.
back on topic.

WHERE/WHEN IS 64BITsssss

Ableton peoples please answer here

Lol ^^ real restriction is composing tunes on a game boy like LittleSoundDJ

not having 64 bit is seriously screwing up my workflow!!! I have 64 bit plugins, 64 bit OS, w -7 , everything 64 bit........... even REASON is 64 BIT!!!!You hear that Abelton ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, REASON IS 64 BIT!...... I am seriously thinking about flushing Live down the shitter. It crashes constantly and no support whatsoever.

tintala wrote:not having 64 bit is seriously screwing up my workflow!!! I have 64 bit plugins, 64 bit OS, w -7 , everything 64 bit........... even REASON is 64 BIT!!!!You hear that Abelton ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, REASON IS 64 BIT!...... I am seriously thinking about flushing Live down the shitter. It crashes constantly and no support whatsoever.

tell us more about the lack of support please
I want to know if I want to invest money in ableton live 9
if also ableton support sucks now I won'T