Page 1 of 44

Climate Change & Einstein's - You cannot solve a problem ...

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:25 am
by krulecello
"Dr. Kevin Anderson is Deputy Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at University of Manchester (UK). In this brutally honest video, he tells us why the world is almost certainly not going to hold global average temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius (2C, or 3.6 Fahrenheit). Indeed, he argues that if we try really hard we might hold it to 3C (5.4F) but more likely we'll see "really catastrophic" 4C (7F) or more by the end of this century. What's at stake is civilization itself."

https://vimeo.com/62871951

I listened to this talk a year ago and recently found it uploaded on Vimeo. When I first listened to it, I had already been 'Car/Motorcycle Free' for over three years and had committed to a principled 'no fly' stand for the same amount of time...ie, I was reasonably well informed on the issue of profligate energy use, thermo dynamics and Climate Change, with such knowledge leading to my various lifestyle changes.

Despite my understanding and direct action, this talk shocked me.....so, if you're prone to depression or cant cope with reality, don't watch/listen to this talk.

***TITLE EDITED 29th June - Original title "Climate Change - Going Beyond Dangerous"
"You cannot solve a problem with the same level of consciousness (thinking) that created it"

Re: Climate Change - Going Beyond Dangerous

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:31 am
by Forge.
and meanwhile the whiny bitches of our country are looking like they are going to vote in that fuckwit abbott over some stupid reasons that nobody even understands when we were finally making some semblance of an effort

we're just doomed, might as well accept it. Sheeple are more interested in whether the PM has an annoying voice or big nose

...not to be too much of a pessemist... :lol:

Re: Climate Change - Going Beyond Dangerous

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:38 am
by Forge.
krulecello wrote:.....so, if you're prone to depression or cant cope with reality, don't watch/listen to this talk.
:lol: I missed this

yeah I might avoid it, been struggling enough with the US govt trying to destroy all the bees and food supply with Monsanto, and fuck face Obama giving them positions in the FDA and dept. of Agriculture.

Seriously, greed will be the thing that destroyed us. It's like people are possessed by it.

But I'm seriously mystified that people here are being duped by Rupert Murdoch's king making bullshit.. People don't seem to have a fucking clue that they are only against this government becaue they are being told to be by the media

Tony Windsor said it's been the most productive 7 years of his political career, we have AAA credit for the first time ever, we keep getting voted happiest country in the world, we have the strongest middle class in the world by a wide margin... meanwhile they're worried that a few poor bastards in boats fleeing war and misery might arrive 3,000 kms away from where they live....

Re: Climate Change - Going Beyond Dangerous

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:46 am
by LoopStationZebra
Wait. Isn't Sweden the happiest country with the largest middle class? Or some such Scandinavian Paradise?

:x :x

Re: Climate Change - Going Beyond Dangerous

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:34 am
by Forge.
LoopStationZebra wrote:Wait. Isn't Sweden the happiest country with the largest middle class? Or some such Scandinavian Paradise?

:x :x
apparently the last couple of years in a row Australia got it

Re: Climate Change - Going Beyond Dangerous

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:35 am
by Forge.
This is what a "socialist" country with free healthcare looks like. ;-)

Image

Image

Re: Climate Change - Going Beyond Dangerous

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 7:35 pm
by krulecello
Not surprisingly, Australia also tops the chart in terms of CO2 emissions per capita. (Note; the chart source is from the World Bank, put in for the pleasure of the conservatives and conspiracy theorists.)

Image

Re: Climate Change - Going Beyond Dangerous

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 7:36 pm
by krulecello
Right. Back on Topic.
krulecello wrote:"Dr. Kevin Anderson is Deputy Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at University of Manchester (UK). In this brutally honest video, he tells us why the world is almost certainly not going to hold global average temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius (2C, or 3.6 Fahrenheit). Indeed, he argues that if we try really hard we might hold it to 3C (5.4F) but more likely we'll see "really catastrophic" 4C (7F) or more by the end of this century. What's at stake is civilization itself."

https://vimeo.com/62871951

Re: Climate Change - Going Beyond Dangerous

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 7:49 pm
by krulecello
Kevin Anderson has a very interesting website with some wonderfully refreshing articles, which can be found here; http://kevinanderson.info

In one article, he is radically (or not so radically) suggesting that climate change academics and scientists actually lead by example. He goes on to suggest, that we all take personal responsibility for our actions, which would definitely include musicians who, in my opinion, are some of the worst offenders when it comes to their travel schedules, not to mention those that fly to attend carbon neutral 'green'[wash] festivals.

http://kevinanderson.info/blog/hypocrit ... y-example/

Re: Climate Change - Going Beyond Dangerous

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 8:49 pm
by Bagatell
"In a story in The Telegraph of London preceding the 2010 COP 16 climate summit in Cancun, he (Kevin Anderson) said that "politicians should consider a rationing system similar to the one introduced during the last 'time of crisis in the 1930s and 40s,' but that this does not necessarily mean a recession or a worse lifestyle, it just means making adjustments in everyday life such as using public transport and wearing a sweater rather than turning on the heating. “Our emissions were a lot less ten years ago and we got by ok then.”[8]

In a BBC story in November 2009 he clarified further:

"When you have something essential like energy that you can't ration just on price - you have to ration it in a more equitable way. So I would suggest for the high reduction rates that we now need, we need something based on equity and whether it's personal carbon trading or whatever, we have to make sure the poorer parts of our communities have access to energy regardless of price. So that means for the rest of us, who consume lots of energy we are going to have to make significant reductions to our levels of emissions - there is no way round this."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_And ... ws_stories

Whatever happened to Al Gore?

Re: Climate Change - Going Beyond Dangerous

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:07 pm
by andydes
krulecello wrote:Not surprisingly, Australia also tops the chart in terms of CO2 emissions per capita. (Note; the chart source is from the World Bank, put in for the pleasure of the conservatives and conspiracy theorists.)
Of course, it's common knowledge that your happiness is in direct correlation to your carbon footprint.

I used half a tonne of South African charcoal to BBQ two fine New Zealand sausages this evening, and I feel amazing.

Re: Climate Change - Going Beyond Dangerous

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 12:00 am
by krulecello
andydes wrote:
krulecello wrote:Not surprisingly, Australia also tops the chart in terms of CO2 emissions per capita. (Note; the chart source is from the World Bank, put in for the pleasure of the conservatives and conspiracy theorists.)
Of course, it's common knowledge that your happiness is in direct correlation to your carbon footprint.

I used half a tonne of South African charcoal to BBQ two fine New Zealand sausages this evening, and I feel amazing.
Sorry, my bad, I expected people to look at the charts posted by Forge to see that they were referring to the 'wealth' of Australia. Thus the correlation is that per capita 'wealth' is closely linked to per capita emissions of CO2. If one believes that 'wealth' equates to 'happiness' then I would have to assume that one is neither wealthy nor happy.

However, if eating sausage helps you to feel amazing, then, by all means, eat sausage.

Re: Climate Change - Going Beyond Dangerous

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 12:03 am
by krulecello
krulecello wrote:Right. Back on Topic.
krulecello wrote:"Dr. Kevin Anderson is Deputy Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at University of Manchester (UK). In this brutally honest video, he tells us why the world is almost certainly not going to hold global average temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius (2C, or 3.6 Fahrenheit). Indeed, he argues that if we try really hard we might hold it to 3C (5.4F) but more likely we'll see "really catastrophic" 4C (7F) or more by the end of this century. What's at stake is civilization itself."

https://vimeo.com/62871951

Re: Climate Change - Going Beyond Dangerous

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 12:25 am
by stringtapper
krulecello wrote:If one believes that 'wealth' equates to 'happiness' then I would have to assume that one is neither wealthy nor happy.
Well… you don't have to assume that.

Maybe you really just want to assume that…?


Oh and here's the solution to the problem:

Image

Re: Climate Change - Going Beyond Dangerous

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 1:01 am
by krulecello
stringtapper wrote:

Oh and here's the solution to the problem:

Image
lol.... Are you, by posting the above text and image, suggesting that I should kill myself to save the planet? Of course, this is only my assumption that that is your meaning (given the available evidence), but it not something that I 'want' to assume.

I'm comfortable for you to believe whatever it is you wish to believe stringtapper. :)