Page 1 of 1

Bounce vs. Freeze?

Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:49 am
by PhunnkMunk
is there any difference in the processing power reduction between freezing an individual track and doing a straight bounce-down?

I've read that freezing is essentially a bounce down, where the new wav file replaces the track contents - though does it still eat up any extra CPU power to have the original stuff (be it MIDI or soundfile, and plugins) frozen in the background?


thanks!

Re: Bounce vs. Freeze

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:50 pm
by BoddAH
No it´s basically the same thing.

Freeze has the advantage of still being able to unfreeze the tracks and edit settings but the projects can only be opened in Live.

Bouncing your tracks is final but then you have the advantage of being able to import the tracks into another DAW for further mixing or mastering.

Re: Bounce vs. Freeze?

Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2013 1:46 pm
by Valiumdupeuple
And bouncing gives you a mono option. Freeze/flatten always renders stereo or double mono files.

Re: Bounce vs. Freeze?

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:39 am
by PhunnkMunk
thanks, guys!