Page 1 of 1
Groups within groups
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 7:34 pm
by Maxadax
I'd like to be able to group tracks inside of other groups. I often find that I'd like to compress different parts inside of a group together before reaching the bus compressor on the group track. It would mean that I can be more efficient and won't have to create new busses every time I want to do more complicated techniques to achieve bus compression, or whatever else effect I would use on a group track.
Re: Groups within groups
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:34 am
by Idonotlikebroccoli
Racks within racks is so much fun, and I imagine groups within groups would be too.
Re: Groups within groups
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:09 am
by IMPULSOUND
Yeah !
Like a mixbus (BUSS Track) in a group or a group within a group
Re: Groups within groups
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 8:20 pm
by IMPULSOUND
Take this improovement forward, its that simple - ok, we are lazy, Hedflux want it, i want it and im shure a lot of other artists would be happy about it!
So support that wish <3
Re: Groups within groups
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:39 pm
by Sternenlicht
+ 1 one for more grouping possibility.
Re: Groups within groups
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 5:26 pm
by fahrradrepariermann
+1
It would help a lot.
Re: Groups within groups
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 5:32 pm
by re:dream
yebo yes for groups wiffin groups
Re: Groups within groups
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 12:08 pm
by samsteeno
+1 more flexible mixing
Re: Groups within groups
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 1:39 pm
by Angstrom
I think they worry about gui clarity.
To illustrate - Heres four groups: Loops[1,2,3,4] Bass1[5,6,7] Bass2 [8,9,10,11] , bass2original[12], bass fx[13,14]
Heres what they fear - Bassgroups[ Loops[1,2,3,4] ,Bass1[5,6,7,Bass2 [8,9,10,11,bass2original[12]],bass fx[13,14] ]
now, does that look a little confusing? That's the problem they would need to solve, and its an issue throughout Live. There is not a clear uniform handling of nested hierarchies. EG in the second example, is bass fx a sibling of Bass1 or Bass2? It's hard to see isn't it.
Tl;dr - I agree, but its not a simple solution, they need to address some big things.