Page 1 of 2
Automat V.0.3.5
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:44 pm
by hoffman2k
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:08 pm
by mrquestion
looks amazing... i use version 2. only problem is tiger only....i can only afford one major update at a time..
now i know it is not fm synthesis, so let me ask...
what can operator do that is so much different than a synth like this...
you can get pads, bass and leads from the automat...
adamajay, i have heard some amazing demos you have done with only automat.what is your opinion
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:11 pm
by ejectorset
yeah but have you seen the modulators screen in it???
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:20 pm
by rodcencko
It works fine with 10.3.9 description is misleading
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:42 pm
by hoffman2k
rodcencko wrote:It works fine with 10.3.9 description is misleading
ok. changed it
Altough the website (
www.alphakanal.de) does say that tiger is needed.
What can the operator do that is so much different than a synth like this...
It all boils down to the sound you prefer.
I like using them both because to me, they sound different.
The operator has a whole different approach to programming it too.
And the velocity modulation is something unique that allows you to make patches, you wouldn't be able to make with automat.
And then there's the tone/time parameters...
Wait till they added a randomize button on the operator
I'm still digging into the new version of automat though.
Some of the Bass-sounds make my hair blow back like i where in a windtunnel.
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:48 pm
by mrquestion
what are the new changes to automat besides the better gui?
and ADAMJAY,,,need your two cents please.......
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 9:00 pm
by hacktheplanet
Oh fuck yes. I LOVE Automat.
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 11:28 am
by jeskola
hoffman2k wrote:rodcencko wrote:It works fine with 10.3.9 description is misleading
ok. changed it
Altough the website (
www.alphakanal.de) does say that tiger is needed.
What can the operator do that is so much different than a synth like this...
It all boils down to the sound you prefer.
I like using them both because to me, they sound different.
The operator has a whole different approach to programming it too.
And the velocity modulation is something unique that allows you to make patches, you wouldn't be able to make with automat.
And then there's the tone/time parameters...
Wait till they added a randomize button on the operator
I'm still digging into the new version of automat though.
Some of the Bass-sounds make my hair blow back like i where in a windtunnel.
can you talk thorugh a basic bass sound setup?
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 11:36 am
by hoffman2k
jeskola wrote:can you talk thorugh a basic bass sound setup?
Did you try out the factory presets?
I know they are not visible. But you can acces them though.
After you loaded Automat in a livetrack. Double-click on automat in the clip view. (not the GUI) and it will show you the basic patches.
There's a pretty phat bass patch in there.
Cheers
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 11:51 am
by jeskola
Arr - i have the latest one... mostly lead type synths...
erm, ill have another play... tbh i found buzzer easier to use.
on another note, a good instrument for bass i found was Claw
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:58 pm
by scdnb.com
isnt there a similar ensemble for REAKTOR? Or mabey a PC wrapper?
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:04 am
by hoffman2k
I made a couple off patches to add to the presets.
Install in user / library / audio / presets /
http://users.telenet.be/Vayner/alphakanal.zip
Enjoy
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:19 am
by jeskola
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 7:23 pm
by hoffman2k
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 7:41 pm
by marky
I'm going to try it out later, though I did have problems with the last release of Automat crashing Live 4 on me. I was planning on running it past the developer in hope of rooting out the problem but never got round to it. Maybe this release will get rid of the problem.
Looking forward to trying it out...
