hows about giving a BACKDATE license to live5 licensees ?

henry ford · Post by **henry ford** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 11:07 pm

hey , hows about giving live 5 owners the opportunity to use the last version of live 4 ? ...... if anything , it would be fun to see how many current live 5 users would rather use live 4.....for live gigs especially.

Soulman · Post by **Soulman** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:06 am

Hmmmmm, I bought version 4 in July just so I could take advantage of the upgrade to version 5 special price............and just a week ago I installed 4.1.4 on my desktop and am now getting productive.

henry ford · Post by **henry ford** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:11 am

my last housemate had 4.14 , and we never visited bugs & problems.

im checking it everyday now that i bought 5....

Johnisfaster · Post by **Johnisfaster** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 2:03 am

yeah the strange thing is if you bought 4 and then upgraded to 5 you could use both programs for around the price of 1 copy of live 5. but if you bought live 5 by itself you only get to use it and not 4...

lame..

henry ford · Post by **henry ford** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 2:11 am

hmm , it dawned on me that all the computer music magazines gave live 5 good , solid healthy reviews....like 9/10 etc.....but its all on the basis that its an innovative piece of software......it was innovative when it was live 1...i'm going to take those reviews with a pinch of salt any more , because if they were based on reality they should really have docked loads of marks for all the bugs etc.......that would teach them not to take software out of its beta stages too early

noou · Post by **noou** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 11:54 am

I'd really like to use Live 4...
I started to love it working in studio with a mate so I bought Live 5 but now I can't render projects, have latency problems and cpu spikes with Live 5.0.2!!!