Page 1 of 5
NI KORE
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:44 pm
by kabelton
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:57 pm
by minimal
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:03 pm
by ewik
looks cool, and that controller is ridiculously awesome looking, but what can kore help me do that i can't already?
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:05 pm
by kabelton
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:13 pm
by funk313
NI´s takin over..or maybe its just another form of RAX..dunno it doesnt state anything about sound recording, editin or sound data manipulation as such..maybe its just another form of open Reason kind of thingyblingy. So yeah what new stuff does it do.. other than look blingy
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:25 pm
by minimal
kabelton wrote:
hmm.. how much?
I don't dare immagine how much...
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:49 pm
by kennerb
That looks awesome. I can't imagine being able to run NI stuff without a cpu hit. Let see what they wanna charge for it.
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:54 pm
by Obineg
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:57 am
by Tarekith
Seems like it's only really geared towards people playing presets though. Not really for someone who wants to tweak their own patches.
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:06 am
by drush
kennerb wrote:I can't imagine being able to run NI stuff without a cpu hit.
i know it talks about stand-alone operation, but you sure about that? seems like if it really offloaded the cpu and acted like smart hardware, they would be making a bigger deal of that fact.
as usual with NI marketing copy, i really can't tell if this thing is cool or not.
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:27 am
by Tarekith
Reminds me of a hardware version of Reason 3's browser to be honest.
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:52 am
by drush
if it had a bunch of DSP they'd be making a big deal of it.
as it is, sounds like it's a glorified controller with some preset browser intelligence. yawn.
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 3:25 am
by computo
yawn...
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:28 am
by anti-banausic
I agree. Unless the hardware is "hardwired" to give access to the software without the CPU hit, then.....so what.
Just a glorified version of something like chainer with a hardware interface, and it looks like some kind of sequencer.
But it would be a step toward something cool, like a hardware box that could be a DSP-like processor for vst software. That would be much cooler than the receptor or even fxteleport.
my .02.
Cheers,
AB
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 5:35 pm
by drush
really just depends on the price. i use a lot of NI stuff so a little dedicated doorway would be nice. but not a lotta money nice.
btw - for anyone trying to interpret NI's marketing speak, i'm pretty sure that "stand-alone" means without a host, not without a computer.
